- 01694 - 0 - Politics and the Russian Army : Civil – Military Relations , 1689 – 2000 Brian
نویسنده
چکیده
This book is about Russian soldiers and the tsars, Communist Party bosses, and presidents they have served. The historic exploits of the Russian and Soviet armies, which crushed Napoleon and Hitler, are well known. This book tells a different, lesser known story about Russian soldiers: the role they have played in domestic politics. As the process of Russian democratization lurches along – one step forward, two steps back, as Lenin said – Russia has at least one advantage over most post-authoritarian states. Unlike many states in transition, Russia does not have a tradition of military intervention or rule: The last successful military coup took place in 1801. The absence of a Russian man on horseback, however, does not imply that the army has played no role in politics. Given Russia’s tumultuous twentieth century, it could hardly be otherwise. The Russian Revolution and civil war, the Stalinist terror of the 1930s, the Second World War, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the current so-called democratic transition are only the most prominent examples of political turbulence. The military has weathered revolution, imperial collapse, and mass murder of the top ranks of the officer corps by the political leadership. Such a series of intense provocations would seem to provide more than adequate grounds for military intervention in politics. Except for a few half-hearted forays, however, the Russian armed forces have remained surprisingly aloof from high politics. Indeed, since the middle of the nineteenth century the army has endeavored to remain “outside politics.”1 The central question of the book is, What role has the Russian army played in domestic political struggles, and why? The most fruitful way to approach the question is to think of military behavior as the product of a twostep process. Armies make political choices based on both the opportunities
منابع مشابه
(Far Eastern National University, Vladivostok, Russia) \
(Far Eastern National University, Vladivostok, Russia) CASE Visiting Fellow, UC Berkeley November 2008 Civil-Military Relations in Russia. Field Report Civil-military relations Civil-military relations are a very important issue for the modern Russian politics. Russia’s location and geopolitical situation required it to participate in multiple wars and conflicts over some 323 years to maintain ...
متن کاملاز انقلاب تا کودتا: مناسبات نظامی ـ مدنی در مصر جدید
The Egypt revolution managed to overthrow the Mubarak regime but soon after, the military took possession of the political atmosphere through the military coup against Mohammad Morsi’s government. In the post-revolution space, whatever has shaped the civil-military relations in Egypt is the method of interactions between the Supreme Council of Armed Forces with the Muslim Brotherhood and other ...
متن کاملKennedy School , John F . Kennedy School of Government CIVIL - MILITARY RELATIONS IN A POST - 9 / 11 WORLD Compiled
On May 14-15, 2008, the John F. Kennedy School of Government and the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College hosted a colloquium entitled “Civil-Military Relations in a Post-9/11 World.” The colloquium, inspired by past, present, and future interactions between civilian leaders and the uniformed military, sought to examine three general areas: the roles and responsibilities of ...
متن کاملAfghanistan And Chechnya: Low Intensity Preludes To Another Revolution CSC 1997 Subject Area – Topical Issues EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Title: Afghanistan And Chechnya: Low Intensity Preludes To Another Revolution Author: Major
Discussion: This paper explores the impact of the LIC experiences in Afghanistan and Chechnya on the transformation of the Russian State. It begins with a historical review that analyzes invasion motives and the subsequent impact on the people, the government and the Russian military. The analysis of the recent post-Soviet era reveals that the Russian transformation consists of three smaller tr...
متن کاملAssessment of the Transformation of Civil-Military Relations in Serbia and Croatia since 2000
Since 2000, the republics of Serbia and Croatia have had very different levels of achievement and success in transforming their national security orientations and doctrine, military structures, and patterns of civil-military relations to conform to the expectations of the Atlantic and European communities. Both nations’ armed services and their respective ministries have abandoned old national ...
متن کامل