D4.1 - Security definitions and attacker models for e-voting protocols
نویسنده
چکیده
In 2010 Hao, Ryan and Zielinski proposed a simple decentralized e-voting protocol that only requires 2 rounds of communication. Thus, for k elections their protocol needs 2k rounds of communication. Observing that the first round of their protocol is aimed to establish the public-keys of the voters, we propose an extension of the protocol as a non-interactive e-voting scheme in the public-key setting (NIVS) in which the voters, after having published their public-keys, can use the corresponding secret-keys to participate in an arbitrary number of one-round elections. We first construct a NIVS with a standard tally function where the number of votes for each candidate is counted. Further, we present constructions for two alternative types of elections. Specifically in the first type (dead or alive elections) the tally shows if at least one voter cast a vote for the candidate. In the second one (elections by unanimity), the tally shows if all voters cast a vote for the candidate. Our constructions are based on bilinear groups of prime order. As definitional contribution we provide formal computational definitions for privacy and verifiability of NIVSs. We conclude by showing intriguing relations between our results, secure computation, electronic exams and conference management systems.
منابع مشابه
Deciding knowledge in security protocols under some e-voting theories
In the last decade, formal methods have proved their interest when analyzing security protocols. Security protocols require in particular to reason about the attacker knowledge. Two standard notions are often considered in formal approaches: deducibility and indistinguishability relations. The first notion states whether an attacker can learn the value of a secret, while the latter states wheth...
متن کاملVerifiability Notions for E-Voting Protocols
There have been intensive research efforts in the last two decades or so to design and deploy electronic voting (e-voting) protocols/systems which allow voters and/or external auditors to check that the votes were counted correctly. This security property, which not least was motivated by numerous problems in even national elections, is called verifiability. It is meant to defend against voting...
متن کاملVerifying equivalence properties of security protocols
Security protocols are used nowadays for securing transactions through public channels, like the Internet. Typical examples of applications include electronic commerce, electronic voting or mobile ad hoc networking. In order to obtain as much confidence as possible, several formal methods have been proposed for analyzing properties of security protocols. Depending on the goals which a security ...
متن کاملVerifying privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols
Electronic voting promises the possibility of a convenient, efficient and secure facility for recording and tallying votes in an election. Recently highlighted inadequacies of implemented systems have demonstrated the importance of formally verifying the underlying voting protocols. We study three privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols: in increasing order of strength, they are ...
متن کاملDefinitions and Criteria of CIA Security Triangle in Electronic Voting System Authors
Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability are three sides of the famous CIA security triangle. Since the evoting systems are built from particular components, the CIA security triangle of these systems has particular definitions for each side. This paper presents these CIA security definitions and criteria which each state-of-the-art electronic voting system must meet based on the view point...
متن کامل