Contextual Deontic Logic Violation Contexts and Factual Defeasibility

نویسنده

  • Yao-Hua Tan
چکیده

In this article we introduce Contextual Deontic Logic (Cdl) to analyze the relation between deontic, contextual and defeasible reasoning. The optimal state, and therefore the set of active obligations, can change radically when the violation context changes. In such cases we say that the obligations only in force in the previous violation context are defeated; contextual deontic logic is therefore a defeasible deontic logic. This is expressed by the deenition O(j) =def O(jn:): ` ought to be (done) if is (done) in the context where is (done)' is deened as` ought to be (done) if is (done) unless : is (done).' The unless clause formalizes explicit exceptions and is analogous to the justiication in Reiter's default rules. Cdl is a monotonic defeasible deontic logic, because it has factual defeasibility but not overridden defeasibility.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An Update Semantics for Prima Facie Obligations

The deontic logic dus is a deontic update semantics for prescriptive obligations based on the update semantics of Veltman. In dus the definition of logical validity of obligations is not based on static truth values but on dynamic action transitions. In this paper prescriptive prima facie obligations are formalized in update semantics. The logic formalizes the specificity principle, has reinsta...

متن کامل

Violation Contexts and Deontic Independence

In this paper we discuss the role of context and independence in normative reasoning. First, deontic operators { obligations, prohibitions , permissions { referring to the ideal context may connict with operators referring to a violation (or contrary-to-duty) context. Second, deontic independence is a powerful concept to derive deontic operators from such operators of other violation contexts. ...

متن کامل

Cancelling and Overshadowing: Two Types of Defeasibility in Defeasible Deontic Logic

IN this paper we give a general analysis of dyadic, deontir logics that were introduced in the earlv eventies to formalize deontic reason­ ing about subideal behavior Recently it was observed that they are closely related to non­ monotonic logics, theories of diagnosis and dc cision theories In particular, we argue that two types of defeasibihty must be distinguished in a defeasible deontic log...

متن کامل

Dynamic Normative Reasoning Under Uncertainty: How to Distinguish Between Obligations Under Uncertainty and Prima Facie Obligations

The deontic update semantics is a dynamic semantics for prescriptive obligations based on Veltman's update semantics, in which the dynamic evaluation of connicts of hierarchic obligations naturally leads to defeasibility. In this paper we use this dynamic semantics to study the diagnostic problem of defeasible deontic logic. For example, consider a defeasible obligationòught to be done' togethe...

متن کامل

Towards a Computational Treatment of Deontic Defeasibility

In this paper we describe an algorithmic framework for a multi-modal logic arising from the combination of the system of modal (epistemic) logic devised by Meyer and van der Hoek for dealing with nonmonotonic reasoning with a deontic logic of the Jones and Pörn-type. The idea behind this (somewhat eclectic) formal set-up is to have a modal framework expressive enough to model certain kinds of d...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000