Evolution of Interdependent Preferences in Aggregative Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the evolution of preference interdependence in aggregative games which are symmetric with respect to material payo¤s but asymmetric with respect to player objective functions. We identify a class of aggregative games whose equilibria have the property that the players with interdependent preferences (who care not only about their own material payo¤s but also about their payo¤s relative to others) earn strictly higher material payo¤s than do the material payo¤ maximizers. Included in the class are common pool resource and public good games. If each member of the population interacts with each other member (the playing-the-...eld model), we show that any evolutionary selection dynamic satisfying a weak payo¤ monotonicity condition implies that only interdependent preferences can survive in the long run. JEL Classi...cation: C72, D62.
منابع مشابه
The strategic advantage of negatively interdependent preferences in action-monotonic games
Investigating the strategic advantage of negatively interdependent preferences in action monotonic games, we derive equivalent criteria both for general action monotonic games and for the subclass of action monotonic games with spillovers. Examples demonstrate the generality of our findings, in particular that the strategic advantage prevails beyond the classes of superand submodular games. The...
متن کاملPreference Evolution and Reciprocity
This paper provides an evolutionary theory of reciprocity as an aspect of preference interdependence. It is shown that reciprocal preferences, which place negative weight on the payoffs of materialists and positive weight on the payoffs of sufficiently altruistic individuals can invade a population of materialists in a class of aggregative games under both assortative and nonassortative matchin...
متن کاملCo-Evolution of Cognition and Preferences
For a long time economists took preferences as given. The study of their origin and formation was considered a question outside the scope of economics. Over the past twenty years this has changed dramatically. In particular there is now a large literature on the evolutionary foundations of preferences (for an overview see [6]). A prominent strand of this literature is the so-called “indirect ev...
متن کاملThe Dynamic Evolution of Preferences∗
This paper develops a general methodology for characterizing the dynamic evolution of preferences in a wide class of strategic interactions. We give simple conditions characterizing the limiting distribution of preferences in general games, and apply our results to study the evolutionary emergence of overconfidence and interdependent preferences. We also show that this methodology can be adapte...
متن کاملThe Strategic Advantage of Negatively Interdependent Preferences
We study certain classes of supermodular and submodular games which are symmetric with respect to material payoffs but in which not all players seek to maximize their material payoffs. Specifically, a subset of players have negatively interdependent preferences and care not only about their own material payoffs but also about their payoffs relative to others. We identify sufficient conditions u...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 31 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000