Fair and Biased Contests
نویسندگان
چکیده
Lotteries vs. All-Pay Auctions in Fair and Biased Contests The form of contests for a single fixed prize can be determined by a designer who maximizes the contestants’ efforts. This paper establishes that, under common knowledge of the two asymmetric contestants’ prize valuations, a fair Tullock-type endogenously determined lottery is always superior to an all-pay-auction; it yields larger expected efforts (revenues) for the contest designer. If the contest can be unfair (structural discrimination is allowed), then the designer’s payoff under the optimal lottery is equal to his expected payoff under the optimal all-pay auction. JEL Classification: D70, D71, D72
منابع مشابه
Revenue Maximizing Head Starts in Contests
We characterize revenue maximizing head starts for all-pay auctions and lottery contests with many heterogeneous players. We show that under optimal head starts all-pay auctions revenue-dominate lottery contests for any degree of heterogeneity among players. Moreover, all-pay auctions with optimal head starts induce higher revenue than any multiplicatively biased all-pay auction or lottery cont...
متن کاملRevenue Maximizing Head Starts in Contests # 524
We characterize revenue maximizing head starts for all-pay auctions and lottery contests with many heterogeneous players. We show that under optimal head starts all-pay auctions revenue-dominate lottery contests for any degree of heterogeneity among players. Moreover, all-pay auctions with optimal head starts induce higher revenue than any multiplicatively biased all-pay auction or lottery cont...
متن کاملLottery versus all-pay auction contests: A revenue dominance theorem
We allow a contest organizer to bias a contest in a discriminatory way, that is, she can favor specifi c contestants through the choice of contest success functions in order to maximize total equilibrium eff ort (resp. revenue). The scope for revenue enhancement through biasing is analyzed and compared for the two predominant contest regimes; i.e. all-pay auctions and lottery contests. Our main...
متن کاملLottery versus All - Pay Auction Contests A Revenue Dominance
We allow a contest organizer to bias a contest in a discriminatory way, that is, she can favor specifi c contestants through the choice of contest success functions in order to maximize total equilibrium eff ort (resp. revenue). The scope for revenue enhancement through biasing is analyzed and compared for the two predominant contest regimes; i.e. all-pay auctions and lottery contests. Our main...
متن کاملGender and Programming Contests: Mitigating Exclusionary Practices
Individuals vary across many dimensions due to the effects of gender-based, personality, and cultural differences. Consequently, programming contests with a limited and restrictive structure (e.g., scoring system, questioning style) are most favourable and attractive to a specific set of individuals with the characteristics that best match this structure. We suggest that a more inclusive and fl...
متن کامل