Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility: A Mechanism for Self/Nonself Discrimination during Sexual Reproduction.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Various mechanisms in flowering plants have evolved to prevent the tendency of self-fertilization created by close proximity of male and female reproductive organs in a perfect flower. One such mechanism, called self-incompatibility (SI), allows the pistil of a plant to reject self pollen or pollen from genetically related individuals, thus preventing inbreeding and promoting outcrosses. Genetic studies camed out early in this century led to the identification of two different types of SI: gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) and sporophytic self-incompatibility (SSI). GSI was first studied in the Solanaceae family, and SSI was first studied in the Cruciferae family. To date, these two families still remain the best characterized for their respective SI systems. In both families, SI is controlled by a multiallelic locus termed the S-locus. For GSI, the SI behavior of the pollen is determined by the genotype of the pollen grain itself, whereas for SSI, the SI behavior of the pollen is determined by the genotype of the pollen parent. This difference most likely reflects the difference in the site of expression of the pollen S-allele: microspores for GSI and tapetal tissue for SSI (de Nettancourt, 1977). In the case of SSI, depending on the S-allele combination, the two S-allele specificities displayed by the pollen may be co-dominant or may exhibit other relationships such as dominance or mutual weakening (de Nettancourt, 1977). Figure 1 illustrates the dlfference in the SI behavior of SSI and GSI, assuming co-dominance of S-alleles in the pollen for SSI. Crosses between an S1S2 plant (female) and an s1s3 plant (male) will be compatible if the species displays GSI and will be incompatible if the species displays SSI. The reasons are as follows. In the case of GSI, the SI phenotypes of SI and S3 pollen produced by the S1S3 plant are S1 and S3, respectively. The pollen bearing Sl-allele is rejected by the pistil of the S1S2 plant because of the matching of the S1allele, whereas the pollen bearing S3-allele, an allele different from those camed by the pistil, is able to effect fertilization to produce SlS3 or S2S3 progeny. The rejection of incompatible pollen usually occurs after the pollen has germinated and
منابع مشابه
On the evolution of genetic incompatibility systems. VI. A three-locus modifier model for the origin of gametophytic self-incompatibility.
Recent genetic analyses have demonstrated that self-incompatibility in flowering plants derives from the coordinated expression of a system of loci. To address the selective mechanisms through which a genetic system of this kind evolves, I present a three-locus model for the origin of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Conventional models assume that a single locus encodes all physiological eff...
متن کاملThe hsp70 protein is involved in the acquisition of gamete self-sterility in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis.
In the hermaphrodite ascidian Ciona intestinalis, gamete self-incompatibility is a mechanism that prevents self-fertilization and is based on the ability of the oocyte vitelline coat to distinguish and accept only heterologous spermatozoa. The onset of self-sterility occurs during oogenesis and involves or is controlled by the follicle cells. Gamete self-nonself discrimination, a process that c...
متن کاملLoss of gametophytic self-incompatibility with evolution of inbreeding depression.
Gametophytic self-incompatibility (SI) in plants is a widespread mechanism preventing self-fertilization and the ensuing inbreeding depression, but it often evolves to self-compatibility. We analyze genetic mechanisms for the breakdown of gametophytic SI, incorporating a dynamic model for the evolution of inbreeding depression allowing for partial purging of nearly recessive lethal mutations by...
متن کاملA short history of time and space in immune discrimination: reply to the commentaries.
The destructive effector functions of the immune system pose a problem that has aptly been described as 'horror autotoxicus'. This problem demands a solution that offers an effective self-nonself discrimination mechanism. Unlike all other defence mechanisms, the immune system makes the self-nonself discrimination somatically, and not at the germline level. This discrimination requires a way of ...
متن کاملAn identical mechanism governs self-nonself discrimination and effector class regulation
Prevailing immunological dogma dictates self-nonself discrimination, meaning to respond or not, and effector class regulation, meaning choosing the most effective response, are two separate decisions the immune system makes when faced with a new antigen. Representing a cardinal departure from the past, our model instead predicts both self-nonself discrimination and effector class regulation are...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Plant physiology
دوره 105 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1994