Developing evidence-based dentistry skills: how to interpret randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
Decision-making based on reliable evidence is more likely to lead to effective and efficient treatments. Evidence-based dentistry was developed, similarly to evidence-based medicine, to help clinicians apply current and valid research findings into their own clinical practice. Interpreting and appraising the literature is fundamental and involves the development of evidence-based dentistry (EBD) skills. Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered to be evidence of the highest level in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. Furthermore, the assessment of the report of a RCT, as well as a SR, can lead to an estimation of how the study was designed and conducted.
منابع مشابه
A systematic review of high quality randomized controlled trials investigating motor skill programmes for children with developmental coordination disorder
OBJECTIVE To identify effective motor training interventions for children with developmental coordination disorder from research graded as high quality (using objective criteria) for the purpose of informing evidence-based clinical practice. DATA SOURCES We followed the guidance for conducting systematic reviews issued by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Six OvidSP electronic databas...
متن کاملThe level of evidence of published articles on orthodontics in PubMed journals from Iran during 2000-2015
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evidence-based dentistry (EBD), including orthodontics, needs the availability and use of the high-quality studies. The aim of this study was to identify the level of evidence (LOE) of Iranian articles on orthodontics published in PubMed.METHODS: All the articles on orthodontics published from 2000 to 2015 in PubMed with Iran affiliations were extracted by typing orthodontic...
متن کاملراهنمای بالینی درمان مبتنی بر شواهد: ویتیلیگو
Clinical practice guidelines are the most important and valid guidelines for treatment of diseases, and are developed through experts consensus on a subject, considering the highest available evidence (systematic reviews, metaanalyses, and randomized controlled trials). We briefly review the latest evidence-based guideline for the treatment of vitiligo provided by European Dermatology Forum.
متن کاملEditorial: Hunting for evidence - a plea for clinical research.
Be honest – what is easier to publish: in vitro or clinical research? But let’s start from the beginning. The “pyramid of evidence” ranks like this: 1a: Systematic reviews (with homogeneity) of randomized controlled trials 1b: Individual randomized controlled trials (with narrow confidence interval) 1c: All randomized controlled trials (or none) 2a: Systematic reviews (with homogeneity) of coho...
متن کاملEvaluation of Clinical Trials
In a number of important clinical issues such as evaluation of the efficacy or effectiveness of therapeutic or preventive interventions as well as for comparing the harms of interventions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest levels of evidence, either directly or indirectly. It is obvious that critical appraisal of these studies to assess their validity and precision is of p...
متن کامل