Campaign Spending with Office-Seeking Politicians, Rational Voters, and Multiple Lobbies
نویسنده
چکیده
I introduce a microfounded model of campaign finance with office-seeking politicians, a continuum of voters, and a large number of heterogeneous lobbies. Lobbies make contributions to politicians according to a common agency framework. Politicians use contributions to finance their electoral expenditures. Voters are not fooled by electoral expenditures: they are influenced in a way that is consistent with the equilibrium behavior of lobbies and politicians. The model is used to: (i) determine the relation between campaign spending and the deviation from the median voter's preferred policy; (ii) show the informational value of lobbies' contributions; (iii) evaluate the welfare implications of restricting campaign spending; and (iv) interpret the empirical finding that campaign expenditures have a very low effect on election outcome. Although in equilibrium advertising provides voters with useful information, under reasonable parameter values, a ban on campaign contributions makes the median voter better off. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: D72, D82, M37. 2001 Elsevier Science (USA)
منابع مشابه
Campaign Spending with O±ce-Seeking Politicians, Rational Voters, and Multiple Lobbies
I introduce a microfounded model of campaign ̄nance with o±ce-seeking politicians, a continuum of voters, and a large number of heterogeneous lobbies. Lobbies make contributions to politicians according to a common agency framework. Politicians use contributions to ̄nance their electoral expenditures. Voters are not fooled by electoral expenditures: they are in°uenced in a way that is consisten...
متن کاملRational Voters and Political Advertising
Most political scholars agree that organized groups play a key role in modern democracy. One aspect of special interest politics that has caught the attention of both academic researchers and the public at large, especially in the US, are campaign contributions. Candidates to various federal and state o¢ ces receive monetary donations from various corporations and pressure groups.1 What do cand...
متن کاملPrivate Sector Policymaking
Candidates often tout their private sector experience when running for public office. Success in the business world, they argue, uniquely qualifies them for government work. In this paper, I test whether businessperson politicians govern differently from other types of leaders using data on over 25,000 Russian mayors and regional legislators. Analyzing both a close election regression discontin...
متن کاملGlenn R . Parker : Self - Policing in Politics
University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher, except for reading and browsing via the World Wide Web. Users are not permitted to mount this file on any network servers. Introduction Like the ...
متن کاملGovernator vs. Hunter and Aggregator: A simulation of party competition with vote-seeking and office-seeking rules
The policy positions parties choose are central to both attracting voters and forming coalition governments. How then should parties choose positions to best represent voters? Laver and Sergenti show that in an agent-based model with boundedly rational actors a decision rule (Aggregator) that takes the mean policy position of its supporters is the best rule to achieve high congruence between vo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 103 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002