Reducing selection bias in a cluster randomized trial in West African villages.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Selection bias in cluster randomized trials may threaten the validity of the results. This bias may occur either at the level of the cluster or of the individual. We describe measures for maintaining comparability of intervention groups in a cluster randomized trial of a health education package to reduce dietary salt. The setting was 12 villages of the Ashanti region of Ghana. In total, 1896 villagers between 40 and 75 years of age were selected to take part in the trial using stratified random sampling, based on age and sex. Following individuals' consent and baseline measurements in a pair of villages, villages were randomized to intervention or control arms, stratified for locality (semi-urban or rural). Primary outcomes of the trial were reduction in 24-hour urinary sodium and blood pressure. Of the villagers, 1013 individuals agreed to take part, with a response rate of 53%. The groups were comparable with respect to mean (SD) systolic and diastolic blood pressure (125/74 (27/14) mmHg versus 126/75 (25/14) mmHg) and other outcomes. In conclusion, in this study blind recruitment, aided by randomization in small blocks, and stratified random sampling of the subjects within the clusters helped to ensure comparability of intervention groups, which is vital for the validity of the trial results.
منابع مشابه
Evolution of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in West African and Central African Strains of Monkeypox Virus
The evolution of bias in synonymous codon usage in chosen monkeypox viral genomes and the factors influencing its diversification have not been reported so far. In this study, various trends associated with synonymous codon usage in chosen monkeypox viral genomes were investigated, and the results are reported. Identification of factors that influence codon usage in chosen monkeypox viral genom...
متن کاملتصادفی سازی در مطالعات کارآزمایی بالینی: از تئوری تا عمل
Background & Aim: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are studies which are able to provide the most valid evidence to compare various interventions in health research. Biases can affect the quality of research and ultimately make the results of a study invalid. One of the most important biases is selection bias. The best way to reduce selection bias is the use of random allocation. The aim of th...
متن کاملA community study of health promotion in rural West Africa: details of a household survey and population census.
BACKGROUND Hypertension is an important problem in sub-Saharan Africa. The low use of processed food in this area makes a population approach to reducing salt intake feasible. AIM To create an age-sex register for 12 villages in Ghana as the first stage of a community study of the effect of dietary salt reduction on blood pressure and urinary sodium excretion in West African villagers. DESI...
متن کاملEffect of zinc supplementation on growth in West African children: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in rural Burkina Faso.
OBJECTIVE To analyse the effects of zinc supplementation on growth parameters in a representative sample of young children in rural Burkina Faso. Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial. Setting Eighteen villages in rural northwestern Burkina Faso. Subjects In all, 709 children aged 6-31 months were enrolled; 685 completed the trial. Intervention Supplementation with ...
متن کاملSelection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND Selection bias and non-participation bias are major methodological concerns which impact external validity. Cluster-randomized controlled trials are especially prone to selection bias as it is impractical to blind clusters to their allocation into intervention or control. This study assessed the impact of selection bias in a large cluster-randomized controlled trial. METHODS The Im...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical trials
دوره 2 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005