A Comparison of the Decision Ladder and the Recognition-Primed Decision Model
نویسنده
چکیده
Cognitive work analysis and cognitive task analysis approach the analysis of decisions in ways that are at least superficially dissimilar. In this paper, I review the two approaches, work (or control) task analysis and naturalistic decision making, to identify similarities and differences, and I assess the implications of looking at decisions from these two different perspectives. I conclude that although these two approaches are superficially dissimilar, they are theoretically compatible. However, the standard form of decision ladder, which is the representational product of work (or control) task analysis, does not take full account of contemporary insights from the three-stage model of situation awareness, the distinction between implicit and explicit cognitive processing, or the principles of naturalistic decision making. I propose modifications of the decision ladder to incorporate these ideas.
منابع مشابه
A Comparison of the Decision Ladder Template and the Recognition-Primed Decision Model
The decision ladder template, one of the tools of cognitive work analysis, attracts attention as a point of comparison for models of naturalistic decision making, such as the recognition-primed decision model. This report compares the decision ladder template and the recognition-primed decision model in terms of five main factors. These factors are origins, concepts, knowledge elicitation, know...
متن کاملUrban Vegetation Recognition Based on the Decision Level Fusion of Hyperspectral and Lidar Data
Introduction: Information about vegetation cover and their health has always been interesting to ecologists due to its importance in terms of habitat, energy production and other important characteristics of plants on the earth planet. Nowadays, developments in remote sensing technologies caused more remotely sensed data accessible to researchers. The combination of these data improves the obje...
متن کاملDetermination of weight vector by using a pairwise comparison matrix based on DEA and Shannon entropy
The relation between the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a topic of interest to researchers in this branch of applied mathematics. In this paper, we propose a linear programming model that generates a weight (priority) vector from a pairwise comparison matrix. In this method, which is referred to as the E-DEAHP method, we consider each row of the pairwise...
متن کاملComparison of Three Decision-Making Models in Differentiating Five Types of Heart Disease: A Case Study in Ghaem Sub-Specialty Hospital
Introduction: cardiovascular diseases are becoming the main cause of mortality and morbidity in most countries. This research goal was to predict the types of heart diseases for more accurate diagnosis by data mining and neural network technics. Method: This research was an applied-survey study and after data preprocessing, three approaches of neural network, decision making tree and Bayes simp...
متن کاملComparison of Three Decision-Making Models in Differentiating Five Types of Heart Disease: A Case Study in Ghaem Sub-Specialty Hospital
Introduction: cardiovascular diseases are becoming the main cause of mortality and morbidity in most countries. This research goal was to predict the types of heart diseases for more accurate diagnosis by data mining and neural network technics. Method: This research was an applied-survey study and after data preprocessing, three approaches of neural network, decision making tree and Bayes simp...
متن کامل