The strategically ignorant principal
نویسنده
چکیده
A principal-agent model is considered in which the principal decides how much private information to acquire before making an offer to the agent (e.g., an insurer decides whether to gather information about the risk status of a potential client through medical testing before offering the client a policy). I prove in a general environment that there is a nontrivial set of parameters for which it is strictly suboptimal for the principal to be completely informed, regardless of the continuation equilibrium following any information acquisition choice. This result is robust to the notion that an informed principal could select any desired equilibrium via persuasion over the agent’s beliefs. The intuition is that to convince the agent that she is contracting honestly given her private information, the principal may need to severely distort the allocation. This distortion can be very costly ex ante. Choosing to be partially ignorant frees the principal from these incentive constraints and partially mitigates the damage to her ex ante payoff. I also determine in a quasilinear, three state case the optimal information acquisition choice for the principal as a function of the parameters of the model. In particular, I characterize when it is optimal to be fully ignorant of the state, when partial ignorance is preferred and when the principal wants to know the state precisely. Although a small literature has looked at the principal’s information acquisition problem in specific environments or for restricted mechanisms, this paper is the first to take a mechanism design approach to the problem in a general environment. This generality is important since it allows the principal to make full strategic use of any information she acquires. Outside of this literature, the principal is assumed to have acquired information; this paper demonstrates that this assumption may be undesirable. ∗Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario (email: [email protected]). The author wishes to thank Charles Zheng for his tremendous guidance and support in this project, participants in the Micro Theory Group at the University of Western Ontario for helpful comments especially Maria Goltsman and Al Slivinski, as well as Ben Lester, Maciej Kotowski, Tymofiy Mylovanov and Gabor Virag. The author also gratefully acknowledges financial support of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship.
منابع مشابه
Evolution in Imperfect Commitment Bargaining -- Strategic versus Ignorant Types --
To commit credibly in bargaining is crucial: In the ultimatum game with its one– sided early commitment power the “proposer” gets (nearly) the whole pie while the “responder” is left with (almost) nothing. When both parties commit simultaneously the (a)symmetric Nash(1950)–bargaining solution, however, predicts (more or less) equal shares. Relying on a continuous connection of these two games b...
متن کاملLearning More by Doing Less
A principal must decide whether to implement each of two independent proposals (e.g., earmark requests, policy reforms, grant funding) of unknown quality. Each proposal is represented by an agent who advocates by producing evidence about quality. Although the principal prefers the most-informative evidence, agents strategically choose less-informative evidence to maximize the probability the pr...
متن کاملEco 2011/31 Department of Economics Asymmetric Awareness and Moral Hazard
This paper introduces asymmetric awareness into the classical principal-agent model and discusses the optimal contract between a fully aware principal and an unaware agent. The principal enlarges the agent’s awareness strategically when proposing the contract. He faces a trade off between participation and incentives. Leaving the agent unaware allows him to exploit the agent’s incomplete unders...
متن کاملDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Voters Can Have Strong Incentives to Become Informed, or to Be Strategically Ignorant
The instrumental incentives of sellsh voters to become politically informed seem to be diluted by low voter probabilities of being pivotal. This incentive dilution does not apply, however, to visible voter eeorts made before candidates nalize their policy positions. Also, while free-riding can dilute incentives within large groups, this dilution can be overwhelmed by scale economies in group in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 102 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017