Towards segment-based recognition of argumentation structure in short texts

نویسنده

  • Andreas Peldszus
چکیده

Despite recent advances in discourse parsing and causality detection, the automatic recognition of argumentation structure of authentic texts is still a very challenging task. To approach this problem, we collected a small corpus of German microtexts in a text generation experiment, resulting in texts that are authentic but of controlled linguistic and rhetoric complexity. We show that trained annotators can determine the argumentation structure on these microtexts reliably. We experiment with different machine learning approaches for automatic argumentation structure recognition on various levels of granularity of the scheme. Given the complex nature of such a discourse understanding tasks, the first results presented here are promising, but invite for further investigation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Towards a Formal Argumentation-based Model for Procedural Texts

In this paper, we first present an analysis of the facets of natural argumentation in procedural texts. Next, we extend the formal model proposed in [2] to accommodate these facets. Finally, we outline the main properties of the model.

متن کامل

Towards Generating Procedural Texts: An Exploration of their Rhetorical and Argumentative Structure

Instructional texts consist of sequences of instructions designed in order to reach an objective. The author or the generator of instructional texts must follow a number of principles to guarantee that the text is of any use. Similarly, a user must follow step by step the instructions in order to reach the results expected. In this paper, we explore facets of instructional texts: general protot...

متن کامل

Parallel Discourse Annotations on a Corpus of Short Texts

We present the first corpus of texts annotated with two alternative approaches to discourse structure, Rhetorical Structure Theory (Mann and Thompson, 1988) and Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (Asher and Lascarides, 2003). 112 short argumentative texts have been analyzed according to these two theories. Furthermore, in previous work, the same texts have already been annotated for thei...

متن کامل

Towards an Analysis of Argumentation Structure and the Strength of Arguments in News Editorials

Editorials in general fall under persuasive texts.These types of texts intend to persuade the readers over a certain issue or topic.Hence persuasion involves the use of persuasive elements(opinion words and expressions)and facts presented in the form of arguments.A closer look at editorials reveals that they consist of an argumentation structure consisting of an opening statement(also known as ...

متن کامل

Towards assessing depth of argumentation

For analyzing argumentative text, we propose to study the ‘depth’ of argumentation as one important component, which we distinguish from argument quality. In a pilot study with German newspaper commentary texts, we asked students to rate the degree of argumentativeness, and then looked for correlations with features of the annotated argumentation structure and the rhetorical structure (in terms...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014