On the Combination of Argumentation Solvers into Parallel Portfolios
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the light of the increasing interest in efficient algorithms for solving abstract argumentation problems and the pervasive availability of multicore machines, a natural research issue is to combine existing argumentation solvers into parallel portfolios. In this work, we introduce six methodologies for the automatic configuration of parallel portfolios of argumentation solvers for enumerating the preferred extensions of a given framework. In particular, four methodologies aim at combining solvers in static portfolios, while two methodologies are designed for the dynamic configuration of parallel portfolios. Our empirical results demonstrate that the configuration of parallel portfolios is a fruitful way for exploiting multicore machines, and that the presented approaches outperform the state of the art of parallel argumentation solvers.
منابع مشابه
On the impact of configuration on abstract argumentation automated reasoning
In this paper we consider the impact of configuration of abstract argumentation reasoners both when using a single solver and choosing combinations of framework representation–solver options; and also when composing portfolios of algorithms. To exemplify the impact of the framework–solver configuration we consider one of the most configurable solvers, namely ArgSemSAT—runner-up of the last comp...
متن کاملLearning Algorithm Portfolios for Parallel Execution
Portfolio-based solvers are both effective and robust, but their promise for parallel execution with constraint satisfaction solvers has received relatively little attention. This paper proposes an approach that constructs algorithm portfolios intended for parallel execution based on a combination of case-based reasoning, a greedy algorithm, and three heuristics. Empirical results show that thi...
متن کاملAutomatic construction of parallel portfolios via algorithm configuration
Since 2004, increases in computational power described by Moore’s law have substantially been realized in the form of additional cores rather than through faster clock speeds. To make effective use of modern hardware when solving hard computational problems, it is therefore necessary to employ parallel solution strategies. In this work, we demonstrate how effective parallel solvers for proposit...
متن کاملWhere Are We Now? State of the Art and Future Trends of Solvers for Hard Argumentation Problems
We evaluate the state of the art of solvers for hard argumentation problems—the enumeration of preferred and stable extensions—to envisage future trends based on evidence collected as part of an extensive empirical evaluation. In the last international competition on computational models of argumentation a general impression was that reduction-based systems (either SAT-based or ASP-based) are t...
متن کاملParallel SAT Solver Selection and Scheduling
Combining differing solution approaches by means of solver portfolios has proven as a highly effective technique for boosting solver performance. We consider the problem of generating parallel SAT solver portfolios. Our approach is based on a recently introduced sequential SAT solver portfolio that excelled at the last SAT competition. We show how the approach can be generalized for the paralle...
متن کامل