Subjective Probabilities Need Not Be Sharp
نویسنده
چکیده
It is well known that classical, aka ‘sharp’, Bayesian decision theory, which models belief states as single probability functions, faces a number of serious difficulties with respect to its handling of agnosticism. These difficulties have led to the increasing popularity of so-called ‘imprecise’ models of decision-making, which represent belief states as sets of probability functions. In a recent paper, however, Adam Elga has argued in favour of a putative normative principle of sequential choice that he claims to be borne out by the sharp model but not by any promising incarnation of its imprecise counterpart. After first pointing out that Elga has fallen short of establishing that his principle is indeed uniquely borne out by the sharp model, I cast aspersions on its plausibility. I show that a slight weakening of the principle is satisfied by at least one, but interestingly not all, varieties of the imprecise model and point out that Elga has failed to motivate his stronger commitment.
منابع مشابه
Calibrating Subjective Probabilities Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models
Abstract. A body of psychological research has examined the correspondence between a judge’s subjective probability of an event’s outcome and the event’s actual outcome. The research generally shows that subjective probabilities are noisy and do not match the “true” probabilities. However, subjective probabilities are still useful for forecasting purposes if they bear some relationship to true ...
متن کاملDifferential survival in Europe and the United States: estimates based on subjective probabilities of survival.
Cross-country comparisons of differential survival by socioeconomic status (SES) are useful in many domains. Yet, to date, such studies have been rare. Reliably estimating differential survival in a single country has been challenging because it requires rich panel data with a large sample size. Cross-country estimates have proven even more difficult because the measures of SES need to be compa...
متن کاملThe evaluation and assessment of deprivation level in rural areas Case: central part of Javanrood
Introduction: Poverty and deprivation are being considered as one of the master problem for the government more specifically for planners in many countries. Deprivation and combating these phenomena are in the center of regional planning. In fact regional balance attainment is being pursued as a mater regional planning target. Achieving this goal demands identification of back ward and depri...
متن کاملA Single-Stage Approach to Anscombe and Aumann's Expected Utility*
Anscombe and Aumann showed that if one accepts the existence of a physical randomizing device such as a roulette wheel then Savage's derivation of subjective expected utility can be considerably simplified. They, however, invoked compound gambles to define their axioms. We demonstrate that the subjective expected utility derivation can be further simplified and need not invoke compound gambles....
متن کاملTaking the Sting out of Subjective Probability
We analyze the subjective (Bayesian) view of probability by giving an analogue of`truth conditions' for subjective probabilities: we deene what has to be the case in a domain in order for the subjective assessment the probability of event E is p to be accurate in the domain. Our analysis is radically diierent from existing approaches, in that we assume from the beginning that subjective probabi...
متن کامل