PDDL 2.1: Representation vs. Computation

نویسنده

Hector Geffner

چکیده

I comment on the PDDL 2.1 language and its use in the planning competition, focusing on the choices made for accommodating time and concurrency. I also discuss some methodological issues that have to do with the move toward more expressive planning languages and the balance needed in planning research between semantics and computation.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Loyal Opposition Comments on Plan Domain Description Languages

In this paper we take a critical look at PDDL 2.1 as designers and users of plan domain description languages. We describe planning domains that have features which are hard to model using PDDL 2.1. We then offer some suggestions on domain description language design, and describe how these suggestions make modeling our chosen domains easier. The Loyal Opposition PDDL has served as the underpin...

متن کامل

ACME vs PDDL: support for dynamic reconfiguration of software architectures

On the one hand, ACME is a language designed in the late 90s as an interchange format for software architectures. The need for reconfiguration at runtime has led to extend the language with specific support in Plastik. On the other hand, PDDL is a predicative language for the description of planning problems. It has been designed in the AI community for the International Planning Competition of...

متن کامل

PDDLAssistant: A tool for assisting construction and maintenance of attack graphs using PDDL

Attack graph is a well-known representation for computer security vulnerabilities, which captures how malicious activities can lead to a system compromise. A key weakness in the attack graph representation is that it scales poorly, particularly in large domains where the graph needs to enumerate both user and system interactions. One way to address this problem is to translate the attack graph ...

متن کامل

Commentary: Imperfect Match: PDDL 2.1 and Real Applications

pddl was originally conceived and constructed as a lingua franca for the International Planning Competition. pddl2.1 embodies a set of extensions intended to support the expression of something closer to “real planning problems.” This objective has only been partially achieved, due in large part to a deliberate focus on not moving too far from classical planning models and solution methods.

متن کامل