A Comparative Study between Modified Misgav Ladach Technique and Pfannensteil Method of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objective: To compare modified Misgav ladach technique of LSCS with conventional method. Method: This was a prospective study conducted over 200 patients undergoing primary LSCS for various reasons. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 100 each; group A underwent LSCS by the Misgav ladach method and group B by the conventional method. The peri operative and short term postoperative outcomes of both groups were compared. T test and Mann whitney test were used to analyze outcomes. Result: The operating time, incision delivery interval and febrile morbidity was significantly reduced in group underwent LSCS by modified Misgav ladach technique compare to comparison group who underwent LSCS by conventional technique.. Conclusion: Misgav ladach technique is a fast and advantageous method of LSCS and is cost effective as well.
منابع مشابه
The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.
INTRODUCTION Caesarean delivery remains the most common intraperitoneal surgical procedure in obstetric and gynaecologic practice. Since time immemorial there have been countless efforts to improve the technique of caesarean section. One such innovative breakthrough technique is the Misgav Ladach method of caesarean of section. The objective of this trial was to compare the intraoperative and s...
متن کاملThe modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial.
BACKGROUND Modifications to the classic cesarean section technique described by Pfannenstiel and Kerr have been proposed in the last few years. The objective of this trial was to compare intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between the Pfannenstiel-Kerr and the modified Misgav-Ladach (MML) techniques for cesarean section. METHODS This prospective randomized trial involved 162 ...
متن کاملMisgav-Ladach cesarean section: general consideration.
Among obstetric techniques, cesarean section seemed to represent a well-defined procedure and significant advances in this intervention were considered to be unlikely. However, obstetric surgery has recently undergone many improvements. In 1972, Joel-Cohen presented a new method for transverse incision of the abdomen. This method, with some modifications, was integrated into the Misgav-Ladach c...
متن کاملCaesarean Section: Could Different Transverse Abdominal Incision Techniques Influence Postpartum Pain and Subsequent Quality of Life? A Systematic Review
The choice of the type of abdominal incision performed in caesarean delivery is made chiefly on the basis of the individual surgeon's experience and preference. A general consensus on the most appropriate surgical technique has not yet been reached. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to compare the two most commonly used transverse abdominal incisions for caesarean delivery,...
متن کاملMaternal and Fetal Effect of Misgav Ladach Cesarean Section in Nigerian Women: A Randomized Control Study
BACKGROUND The poor utilisation of the Misgav-Ladach (ML) caesarean section method in our environment despite its proven advantage has been attributed to several factors including its non-evaluation. A well designed and conducted trial is needed to provide evidence to convince clinician of its advantage over Pfannenstiel based methods. AIM To evaluate the outcome of ML based caesarean section...
متن کامل