Political Structure as Determinant of Federal Spending
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article seeks to analyze the allocation of federal government discretionary spending among Brazil’s states. In Brazil, the bulk of federal public budget must be compulsorily executed. Personnel expenditures and social taxes, social security benefits and a series of constitutionally mandatory transfers to states and municipalities are examples of expenditures over which the government has no discretionary powers whatsoever. Even the vast majority of current expenditures can be considered compulsory, since they finance the government’s operations. Although the budget is heavily constrained by these expenditures, the Executive retain approximately R$ 20bn at its disposal for discretionary spending in 2003, equivalent to 6% of total expenditures, mainly comprising new programs or expansion of existing programs and public investments.
منابع مشابه
School Reforms and School Spending Growth
The evolution of school spending over time is related to legislative school reforms expanding the scale and the scope of the school system. This study addresses the determination of legislative reforms and primary school spending, using a data base for Norway 1880 1990. Reforms are understood as the result of growth in demand for school services over time and economic and political conditions c...
متن کاملThe Political Determinants of Federal Expenditure at the State Level
It has been shown that states with higher per capita senate representation have higher federal spending per capita (Atlas, C. M., Gilligan, T. A., Hendershott, R. J. and Zupan, M. A. (1995). American Economic Review 85: 624–629). With a more recent data sample, more highly disaggregated data and a different set of political control variables, we are able to confirm the main result of Atlas et a...
متن کاملThe Political Economy of Medicaid Expansion: Federalism, Interest Groups, and the ACA
Medicaid was established in 1965 as a joint state and federal program to provide medical insurance to Americans who are poor and have disabilities, and it has grown from 1 percent to 3 percent of GDP. The source of Medicaid’s growth over the past 50 years must inform efforts to reform the program and slow spending. The literature on the political economy of Medicaid provides strong evidence of ...
متن کاملCampaign Finance Regulation: Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences
Efforts to limit political contributions and spending are extremely popular. Yet there is no serious evidence that campaign finance regulation has achieved or will achieve its goals of reducing the influence of money, opening up the political system, and lowering the cost of campaigns. Indeed, since the 1974 amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act, spending has risen sharply, the number...
متن کاملMoochers and Makers in the Voting Booth Who Benefits from federal spending and hoW
the 2012 election campaign popularized the notion that people who benefit from federal spending vote for democrats, while people who pay the preponderance of taxes vote republican. a survey conducted during the election included questions to test this hypothesis and to assess the accuracy of voters’ perceptions of federal spending. Voters’ perceptions of their benefit from federal spending are ...
متن کامل