The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform
نویسنده
چکیده
One of the most important, but until now neglected, aspects of the new politics of welfare in western Europe concerns new nationally-negotiated social pacts, referred to in a previous article as ‘competitive corporatism’ (Rhodes 1998) to distinguish them from traditional forms of social corporatism and to signal their competitiveness rationale. These pacts, which have proliferated since the late 1980s, have major implications for welfare states by bridging, and innovating in linkages, between the informal and formal welfare states, that is between social security systems and labour market rules and regulations. All of them consist of new market conforming policy mixes. But they are also far from being the vehicles for neo-liberal hegemony in social and employment policymaking. The essential argument of this paper is that the emergence of social pacts is linked to common domestic and external pressures for reform across Europe. But contrary to the expectations of many commentators, these pressures have bolstered efforts at co-ordination via bargaining rather than fragmenting political-economic structures. Underpinning these pacts are various degrees of associational cohesion and, perhaps most importantly, the development of two types of coalition distributional coalitions and productivity coalitions with complex links and overlaps between them. ‘Competitive corporatism’ is successfully achieved if underpinned by a close but flexible linking of the two.
منابع مشابه
Social Pacts Revisited: ‘Competitive Concertation’ and Complex Causality in Negotiated Welfare State Reforms
▪ This article discusses three major issues related to tripartite social pacts: first, the puzzles they present for classic theories of corporatism; second, the contrasts between the political economies of ‘competitive concertation’ and Keynesian coordination; and third, the problems of assessing their effects in the context of complex causality. The main focus is on one specific policy area: n...
متن کاملReform with Career Concerns
We study a model of political economy in which the policy choice of an incumbent politician when he is concerned with the perception of his capability. We show that politicians may engage in socially detrimental reform in order to be perceived as more capable. Conservative institutions that thwart reform may potentially improve social welfare.
متن کاملLiberalization and Democratization: the Forum and the Hearth in the Era of Cosmopolitan Post-industrial Capitalism
The processes described under the misleading term “privatization” have been part of a major social restructuring in both the political and economic spheres. Most notably, widespread state failures have resulted in significant changes in the form and functions of the state. This reform encompasses not only the collapse of state socialism, but also crises and radical reforms in developed capitali...
متن کاملUncontrolled Experiments from the Laboratories of Democracy: Traditional Cash Welfare, Federalism, and Welfare Reform
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Political Economy Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Welfare ...
متن کاملA politically feasible social security reform with a two-tier structure
Yamada, Tomoaki—A politically feasible social security reform with a two-tier structure This paper investigates the welfare implications and political feasibility of social security reforms with a two-tier structure in Japan. We evaluate social security reforms from two points of view: (i) the ex-ante expected value of future generations, and (ii) whether current generations prefer reform to th...
متن کامل