Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.

نویسندگان

  • Konstantinos X Michalakis
  • Hiroshi Hirayama
  • Pavlos D Garefis
چکیده

This article presents a comparison of screw-retained and cement-retained implant prostheses based on the literature. The advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the 2 different types of restorations are discussed, because it is important to understand the influence of the attachment mechanism on many clinical aspects of implant dentistry. Several factors essential to the long-term success of any implant prosthesis were reviewed with regard to both methods of fixation. These factors include: (1) ease of fabrication and cost, (2) passivity of the framework, (3) retention, (4) occlusion, (5) esthetics, (6) delivery, and (7) retrievability. (More than 50 references).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An alternative direct technique for the fabrication of an implant-supported, screw-retained fixed interim restoration.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Yilmaz et al Lautensack et al 7. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28. 8. Okamoto M, Minagi S. Technique for removing a cemented superstructure from an implant abutment. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:241-2. 9. Chee WW, Torbati A, Albouy JP....

متن کامل

Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Optimal occlusion and esthetics are goals in prosthetic treatment. Implant dentistry is no exception. PURPOSE OF ARTICLE The purpose of this article is to discuss how the choice to use screw-retained or cement-retained implants dramatically influences the occlusion and esthetics.

متن کامل

Covering the Screw-Access Holes of Implant Restorations in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Report

Screw-retained implant restorations have an advantage of predictable retention as well as retrievability, and obviate the risk of excessive sub-gingival cement commonly associated with cement retained implant restorations. Screw-retained restorations generally have screw access holes, which can compromise esthetics and weaken the porcelain around the holes. The purpose of this study is to descr...

متن کامل

Survey of Screw-Retained versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations in Saudi Arabia

Introduction Implant-supported prostheses are currently the standard treatment for the replacement of missing teeth and deficiencies. Implant restorations can either be screw-retained, cement-retained, or both. The implant retention system type is typically chosen during the treatment plan. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of implant restoration retention system...

متن کامل

A systematic review of screw- versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed restorations.

PURPOSE To systematically evaluate the survival and success of screw- versus cement-retained implant crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors performed an electronic search of nine databases using identical MeSH phrases. Systematic evaluation and data extraction of the articles from 1966 through 2007 were completed by three reviewers and two clinical academicians. The major outcome variable ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

دوره 18 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003