Treatment of Epistemic Uncertainty in Environmental Fate Models – Consequences on Chemical Safety Regulatory Strategies
نویسندگان
چکیده
The practical impact of treatment of epistemic uncertainty on decision making was illustrated on two kinds of decisions from chemical regulation. First, regulatory strategies derived from a simplified decision model based on toxicity and persistence showed that regulated level of exposure is more conservative (safe) when uncertainty has been given a non-probabilistic treatment. Persistence and its uncertainty had been assessed by a Level II fugacity model for which input parameters had been quantified either by Bayesian probabilities, fuzzy numbers (non-probabilistic), or combinations of these (probability boxes). These findings are restricted to how we let decision makers respond to uncertainty in model predictions by the chosen set of decision rules. Further, the use of either treatment depends on the quality and quantity of background knowledge and the required level of detail on the assessment. In the absence of experimentally tested physicochemical endpoints, European chemical regulation REACH allows the use of non-testing strategies such as Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (QSPR) to predict the required information. The second decision problem was to select which chemical substances to prioritize for experimental testing in order to strengthen the background knowledge for chemical regulation with respect to the uncertainty in QSPR predictions. We found that the value of reducing uncertainty, given by the expected gain in net benefit for society, was affected by its treatment and there were no consistent order of testing of the three compounds. However, value of information is a Bayesian probabilistic approach that, unless developed further, loose its interpretability under other treatments of uncertainty. The framework of a predictive model, risk model, decision model and value of information analysis provides a computational template for further evaluation of the effect of treatment of uncertainty on decision making.
منابع مشابه
Robustness-based portfolio optimization under epistemic uncertainty
In this paper, we propose formulations and algorithms for robust portfolio optimization under both aleatory uncertainty (i.e., natural variability) and epistemic uncertainty (i.e., imprecise probabilistic information) arising from interval data. Epistemic uncertainty is represented using two approaches: (1) moment bounding approach and (2) likelihood-based approach. This paper first proposes a ...
متن کاملComparing uncertainty data in epistemic and ontic sense used to decision making problem
In the paper aspect of comparability alternatives in decision making problem by imprecise or incomplete information isexamined. In particular, new definitions of transitivity based on the measure of the intensity preference between pairsof alternatives in epistemic and ontic case is presented and its application to solve decision making problem is proposed.
متن کاملQuantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies
There will be simplifying assumptions and idealizations in the availability models of complex processes and phenomena. These simplifications and idealizations generate uncertainties which can be classified as aleatory (arising due to randomness) and/or epistemic (due to lack of knowledge). The problem of acknowledging and treating uncertainty is vital for practical usability of reliability anal...
متن کاملA robust Bayesian approach to modeling epistemic uncertainty in common-cause failure models
In a standard Bayesian approach to the alpha-factor model for common-cause failure, a precise Dirichlet prior distribution models epistemic uncertainty in the alpha-factors. This Dirichlet prior is then updated with observed data to obtain a posterior distribution, which forms the basis for further inferences. In this paper, we adapt the imprecise Dirichlet model of Walley to represent epistemi...
متن کاملNumerical Sensitivity and Efficiency in the Treatment of Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainty
Nowadays, the need to treat both epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in a unified framework is well recognized [1]. One method to do so is to mix probabilistic convolution (for aleatory uncertainty) and fuzzy calculus (for epistemic uncertainty). Existing propositions either concern simple models [2] or are computationally very costly [3] (a luxury not always affordable, especially in nuclear sa...
متن کامل