I’m okay, you’re not okay: Constancy of character and Paul’s understanding of change in his own and Peter’s behaviour
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Note: Prof. Dr Eric Stewart, Augustana College, Rock Island, Illinois, USA is participating in the research project of Prof. Dr Ernest van Eck, Department of New Testament Studies of the Faculty of Theology at the University of Pretoria, South Africa. This article was initially presented as a paper at the International Meeting of the Context Group that was held at the University of Pretoria on 02–05 August 2010. The author is grateful for funding provided by the University of Pretoria and from the William A. Freistat Center at Augustana College in Rock Island, Illinois.
منابع مشابه
The Paradox of Intervening in Complex Adaptive Systems; Comment on “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation”
This commentary addresses two points raised by Kitson and colleagues’ article. First, increasing interest in applying the Complexity Theory lens in healthcare needs further systematic work to create some commonality between concepts used. Second, our need to adopt a better understanding of how these systems organise so we can change the systems overall behaviour, creates a paradox. We seek to m...
متن کاملOn the role of context and prosody in the interpretation of 'okay'
We examine the effect of contextual and acoustic cues in the disambiguation of three discourse-pragmatic functions of the word okay. Results of a perception study show that contextual cues are stronger predictors of discourse function than acoustic cues. However, acoustic features capturing the pitch excursion at the right edge of okay feature prominently in disambiguation, whether other contex...
متن کاملAnother Look at the Hypocrisy of Chaucer’s Pardoner
For us, readers of Chaucer living in an age when appeal to religious passions and sentiments as a means for the realization of worldly objectives by some charlatans has grown significantly, reviewing the theme of religious hypocrisy treated in The Canterbury Tales can be useful in a way that it proves a helpful means for recognizing and dealing with the hypocrites. The Pardoner of the Tales is ...
متن کاملMultiagent Compromises and Joint Fixpoint Semantics
We assume the requirements or desi res of an agent are modeled by a logic program. In a multi-agent setting, a joint decision of the agents, reflecting a compromise of t he various requirements, corresponds to a suitable joint model of the respective logic programs. In this paper, an appropriate semantics for selecting joint models representing compromises is proposed: the joint fixpoint semant...
متن کاملAmbiguous Aversion; A Descriptive Model of Human Behaviour based on Quran
Background and Aim: The current study aimed to investigate "ambiguous aversion behavior" based on Quran explains. The lack of "Descriptive Models of Human Behaviour" (DMHB) is one of the oldest anomalies in behavioral sciences. It's because different scientific demands to understand, predict and control human behavior. Specially, ambiguous aversion that is a common behavior and extremely influe...
متن کامل