Comparative Analysis of Thoracotomy and Sternotomy Approaches in Cardiac Reoperation
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Reoperation of cardiac surgery via median sternotomy can be associated with significant complications. Thoracotomy is expected to reduce the risk of reoperation and to enhance the surgical outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed two operative approaches (thoracotomy vs. sternotomy) in cardiac reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September 2007 to December 2010, 35 patients who required reoperation of the mitral valvular disease following previous median sternotomy were included. Average age of patients was 45.8±15.4 years (range, 14 to 76 years) and male-to-female was 23:12. Interval period between primary operation and reoperation was 135.8±105.6 months (range, 3.3 to 384.9 months). RESULTS Comparative analysis was done dividing the patient group into two groups that are thoracotomy group (22 patients) and sternotomy group (13 patients). Thoracotomy group was significantly lower in operative time (415.2±90.3 vs. 497.5±148.0, p<0.05), bleeding control time (108.0±29.5 vs. 146.4±66.8, p<0.05) and chest tube drainage (287.5±211.5 mL vs. 557.3±365.5 mL, p<0.05) compared to sternotomy group. CONCLUSION The thoracotomy approach is superior to sternotomy in some variables, and it is considered as a valid alternative to repeat median sternotomy in patients who underwent a previous median sternotomy.
منابع مشابه
Non-sutureless minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: mini-sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy: a series of 1130 patients.
OBJECTIVES Aortic valve replacement through conventional sternotomy still represents the gold-standard surgical approach for aortic valve disease. However, given the increasing number of patients with comorbidities, strategies that can improve operative results are always sought. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery, although related to a steep learning curve, might be associated with improv...
متن کاملThe influence of right anterolateral thoracotomy in prepubescent female patients on late breast development and on the incidence of scoliosis.
BACKGROUND It is assumed that a right anterolateral thoracotomy for correction of simple congenital cardiac defects (ie, atrial septal defect) achieves more favorable cosmetic results than a standard median sternotomy. METHODS Ninety-five patients, 72 with right anterolateral thoracotomy and 23 with median sternotomy, who had corrective transatrial operations when they were younger than 12 ye...
متن کاملRight thoracotomy approach for open heart surgery
Though most cardiac operations are performed through median sternotomy because of its versatility and familiarity to surgeons, the fact is sternotomy is not without complications, and the problems of post sternotomy pain, dehiscence, mediastinitis, osteomyelitis and unstable sternum increases morbidity and mortality in these patients. Median sternotomy may also leave a bad scar which patients d...
متن کاملPosterior Pericardial Effusion Affecting Hemodynamics Occurred Late after Cardiac Surgery: Left Mini-Thoracotomy as an Alternative Surgical Approach to Redo Sternotomy. Three Case Reports
Although sternotomy represents the main surgical access for most cardiac interventions, there are some cases in which alternative surgical approaches may be safer. A re-sternotomy may determine, in patients affected by posterior or very lateral pericardial effusion or mass and in redo-surgery procedures, an increased risk of injury to cardiac structures or previously placed bypass grafts. Moreo...
متن کاملChoice of incision in penetrating cardiac injuries: Which one must we prefer: Thoracotomy or sternotomy?
BACKGROUND Penetrating cardiac injuries are high-risk, high-mortality injuries considering the outcomes. Therefore, it is important to choose the appropriate incision. In general clinical settings, thoracotomy and median sternotomy are choices of incisions to explore the injury. In this study, the results of median sternotomy and thoracotomy in penetrating cardiac injuries were compared. METH...
متن کامل