Agent deliberation in an executable temporal framework
نویسنده
چکیده
Autonomous agents are not so difficult to construct. Constructing autonomous agents that will work as required is much harder. A clear way in which we can design and analyze autonomous systems so that we can be more confident that their behaviour is as required is to use formal methods. These can, in principle, allow us to exactly specify the behaviour of the agent, and verify that any implementation has the properties required. In addition to using a more formal approach, it is clear that problems of conceptualization and analysis can be aided by the use of an appropriate abstraction. In this article we tackle one particular aspect of formal methods for agent-based systems, namely the formal representation and implementation of deliberation within agents. The key aspect here is simplicity. Agents are specified using a relatively simple temporal logic and are executed by directly interpreting such temporal formulae. Deliberation is captured by modifying the way in which execution handles its temporal goals. Thus, in this article we provide motivations, theoretical underpinnings, implementation details, correctness arguments, and comparisons with related work.
منابع مشابه
Logical Implementation of Uncertain Agents
We consider the representation and execution of agents specified using temporal logics. Previous work in this area has provided a basis for the direct execution of agent specifications, and has been extended to allow the handling of agent beliefs, deliberation and multi-agent groups. However, the key problem of uncertainty has not been tackled. Given that agents work in unknown environments, an...
متن کاملTemporal Planning in Dynamic Environments for P-CLAIM Agents
Time and uncertainty of the environment are very important aspects in the development of real world applications. Another important issue for the real world agents is, the balance between deliberation and reactivity. But most of the agent oriented programming languages ignore some or all of these important aspects. In this paper we try to fill this gap by presenting an extension to the architec...
متن کاملArgumentative Deliberation for Autonomous Agents
This paper presents an argumentation based framework, developed as an extension of an existing framework for nonmonotonic reasoning, in order to support an agent’s self deliberation process. The framework allows the agent to draw conclusions taking into account in a natural way a given preference policy. After developing the argumentation framework we examine two general cases of such argumenta...
متن کاملRule-Based Agents in Temporalised Defeasible Logic
This paper provides a framework based on temporal defeasible logic to reason about deliberative rule-based cognitive agents. Compared to previous works in this area our framework has the advantage that it can reason about temporal rules. We show that for rule-based cognitive agents deliberation is more than just deriving conclusions in terms of their mental components. Our paper is an extension...
متن کاملA Goal Deliberation Strategy for BDI Agent Systems
One aspect of rational behavior is that agents can pursue multiple goals in parallel. Current BDI theory and systems do not provide a theoretical or architectural framework for deciding how goals interact and how an agent can decide which goals to pursue. Instead, they assume for simplicity reasons that agents always pursue consistent goal sets. By omitting this important aspect of rationality,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Applied Logic
دوره 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011