Stability of the Biological Science. toward an Evolutionist Epistemology, without Refutations and Revolutions

Popper, not believing in the possibility of the existence of a truth criteria, proposes a falsiable one. Knowledge would not be formed through generalizations from the experiment, but through the elaboration of high empiric content conjectures that would be submitted to deductive logics (based on modus tolles) and experiment. Popper, under Humean influence, denies any role of induction in knowledge aquisition, that would not come either from perceptions or from observations or data collection, but from problems. In the lack of conclusive criteria of the empiric truth, we simply have to learn from our mistakes. The progress of knowledge would come from the refusal to a hypothesis and the search for a better explained content that could avoid at least some of the previous hypothesis faults. This would be the scientific progress criteria.