Comparison of the root-end seal provided by bioceramic repair cements and White MTA.

AIM To compare the ability of Ceramicrete, BioAggregate and white ProRoot MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) to prevent glucose leakage through root-end fillings. METHODOLOGY After root canal instrumentation, the apical 3 mm of maxillary incisors were resected and retropreparations, 3 mm in depth, were created with ultrasound. Root-end cavities were filled with the tested materials (15 roots per group). All roots were mounted in a double-chamber system to assess glucose penetration using 15 psi pressure application. After 1 h, glucose concentrations in the lower chamber were measured following an enzymatic reaction. Four roots were used as controls. One-way anova verified differences in glucose leakage between groups and Tukey test performed multiple comparisons. Significance was set at α = 5%. RESULTS There was a significant difference between the three materials (anova, P < 0.05). Ceramicrete had significantly lower glucose penetration than BioAggregate (Tukey, P < 0.05). There was no difference between the two bioceramic cements and white MTA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both endodontic bioceramic repair cements displayed similar leakage results to white MTA when used as root-end fillings materials. Ceramicrete had significantly lower glucose penetration.