Violence: Rationality and Reasonableness
ثبت نشده
چکیده
1The influence of the Greek heritage (Hellenism) on human civilization is both indelible and undeniable. One major component of this heritage is the systematic employment of the mind in the pursuit of knowledge, both theoretical and practical –sometimes described as the “rational” or “rationalist” (as opposed to “mythical”) approach of trying to understand the world and to dealing with it. By the time the Islamic World “came into its own” in the 8 and 9 centuries, and theologians of different hues began to extol the unique virtues of the revelatory knowledge introduced to the world by the Holy Qur’an, a debate began to take shape concerning the comparative status or value of the two species or bodies of knowledge which now seemed to “compete” with one another –the rational and the revealed. Meanings of terms such as “rational” and “knowledge” had to be analyzed seriously and in depth. After all, could one hold a revealed truth or item of knowledge not to be rational? Does Faith altogether exclude Reason? On the other hand, can items of knowledge be founded on Articles of Faith? Can theology itself be considered a “scientific” discipline, containing knowledge? Or is it simply a collection of fables?
منابع مشابه
Common Priors For Like-Minded Agents
Two agents are like-minded when their beliefs are equal once conditioned on knowledge of both of their types. Assuming the existence of an outside observer that is commonly known to be likeminded and uninformative about the insiders, we derive the existence of a common prior among the insiders, with the outsiders beliefs (appropriately conditioned) serving as the common prior. A key advantage o...
متن کاملShsu Economics Working Paper
The classical theory of rational choice is built on several important internal consistency conditions. In recent years, the reasonableness of those internal consistency conditions has been questioned and criticized, and several responses to accommodate such criticisms have been proposed in the literature. This paper develops a general framework to accommodate the issues raised by the criticisms...
متن کاملThe views of Karl Popper and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI on a theory of rationality
Typical of some contemporary theories of rationality is the pithily formulated idea stated almost 20 years ago by Gillian Rose (1947-1995) in her autobiography: «Reason, the critical criterion, is forever without ground». One important way of understanding this statement is found in the early writings of Karl R. Popper (1902-1994). This statement expresses the conviction at the root of Popper’s...
متن کاملAdmissibility of Battered- Spouse-syndrome Evidence in Alaska
Despite the exceptionally high rates of domestic violence in Alaska, Alaskan jurisprudence affords battered women varied and sparse guidance for the use of their experience as a battered woman in criminal trials. Of the minimal guidance offered, none arises in the form of a binding Alaska Supreme Court opinion, rule of evidence, or governing statute. As one of the few states lacking established...
متن کاملRe-Reading Mulla Sadra on the Intersection of Cognition and Emotion
Human emotions are in connection with his deeds on the one hand and his perceptions on the other, and this complicates the analysis of emotion. Furthermore, any school of thought in search of presenting a comprehensive perspective on the human should clarify its stance with regard to emotion and the position it has in the structure of human cognition and deeds. This fact places the answer to th...
متن کامل