Mapping alignable or nonalignable differences between domains affects idea quality during analogical problem solving

نویسنده

  • Cynthia Sifonis
چکیده

Research reported by Sifonis (2008) has demonstrated that the type of comparison made during analogical problem solving affects the quality of the ideas generated. Ideas generated by mapping the differences between domains are rated as less practical than ideas generated by mapping similarities between domains. However, ideas generated by mapping the differences between domains are more creative than ideas generated by mapping the similarities. The current study examines whether these effects of comparison could be due to mapping alignable or nonalignable differences between domains. The data used in the Sifonis (2008) study were examined to determine whether participants used alignable or nonalignable differences between domains to generate ideas for the source domain. Analyses indicated that ideas generated using alignable differences are more practical than ideas generated using nonalignable differences. Ideas generated using nonalignable differences are more creative than ideas using alignable differences. Practical applications of these findings will be discussed.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Fate of Irrelevant Information in Analogical Mapping

Research on analogical mapping has not yet focused on the fate of information about the base and target domains that is not relevant to the correspondence. We suggest that there are two methods for dealing with irrelevant information in analogies. Nonalignable objects are ignored, while irrelevant attributes of alignable differences are packed away using a process that is a long term equivalent...

متن کامل

The Effects of Alignability on Memory

According to structure-mapping theory. the process of comparison is one of alignment and mapping between representational structures. This process induces a focus on commonalities and alignable differences (i.e., those related to the commonalities). Nonalignable differences (i.e,, those not related to the commonalities) are held to be neglected. The theory thus predicts increased focus on the C...

متن کامل

STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT IN COMPARISON: No Difference Without Similarity

Theories of similarity generally agree that the similarity ofa pair increases with its commonalities and decreases with its differences. Recent research suggests that this comparison process involves an alignment of structured representations yielding commonalities, differences related to the commonalities, and differences unrelated to the commonalities. One counterintuitive prediction of this ...

متن کامل

Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons.

Similarity is a central component of many cognitive processes. Current research suggests that similarity is well characterized as a comparison of structured representations. This process yields commonalities, differences related to the commonalities (alignable differences), and differences not related to the commonalities (nonalignable differences). In the first study, further evidence for this...

متن کامل

Processing Product Unique Features: Alignability and Involvement in Preference Construction

Consumers often form preferences based on the presented attributes of choice options. Previous research has suggested that consumers tend to form their preferences using the attributes that are related to common aspects between the options (i.e., alignable differences) and ignore attributes that are unique to individual options (i.e., nonalignable differences). We combine cognitive psychology a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011