Collections and Paradox
نویسندگان
چکیده
This essay is dedicated to Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman — but not to each of them separately, but to all of them jointly, as a group, or a set, or a mereological sum. This group was an important part of a community of logicians and philosophers at the University of Amsterdam, that had a stimulating influence on my first ventures into formal semantics in the course of the 1970’s. The discussion below ties in directly with that work. My topic will be the conceptual viability of the very idea of ”collective entities” such as “Frank, Martin and Jeroen” and “the Amsterdam Montagovians.” Most theories of formal semantics assume that such plural noun phrases denote higher-level entities of some sort, that have individuals (such as Frank, Jeroen and Martin) as their members or parts. But this assumption has been challenged. A sweeping argument against ”collections” of any kind was raised in the eighties and nineties by George Boolos, James Higginbotham and Barry Schein [4, 5, 8, 27]: collections engender paradox. The chapters on plurals in some fairly recent handbooks in the Philosophy of Language [28, 15] still discuss this argument at great length, treating it as one of the most important issues in the field. Nonetheless, most researchers in this area seemed not at all disturbed by this challenge, and did not feel the need to deal with it. Fred Landman [11] for instance, in the context of an otherwise detailed discussion of Schein’s proposals about plurals, shrugs it o↵ with a deadpan witticism:
منابع مشابه
Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited: More Lessons about that Ambiguous Word, Random
The Bertrand paradox question is: “Consider a unit-radius circle for which the length of a side of an inscribed equilateral triangle equals 3 . Determine the probability that the length of a ‘random’ chord of a unit-radius circle has length greater than 3 .” Bertrand derived three different ‘correct’ answers, the correctness depending on interpretation of the word, random. Here we employ geomet...
متن کاملPERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE OF ABDOMINAL ABSCESSES AND FLUID COLLECTIONS
This report summarizes the results of 64 percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses and fluid collections in 56 patients. Aspiration and drainage was guided with computed tomography in 34 patients and with ultrasound in 30 patients. Success rate was 90%. Infected collections were successfully drained in 94% and noninfected collections in 72% . Partial success was achieved in two...
متن کاملHow Debunking the Osteological Paradox Results in Improved Quality of Life for Retiring Apes
Copyright: © 2013 Rothschild B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The term “osteological paradox” has been used to disparage research derived from skeletal collections [1]. Their explanation: Aft...
متن کاملParadox in the Poetry of Hazin-e Lahiji
Paradox is one of the literary techniques in the poetry of the Safavid poets. Hazin-e Lahiji, like so many other poets of that age, employed this technique in his pursuit and showed that "unfamiliar meaning". Paradox is used in the poetry of Hazin-e Lahiji for the purpose of defamiliarization and exoticism. The poet in order to create new implications and subtle and insightful points and also t...
متن کاملThe Paradox of Health Policy: Revealing the True Colours of This ‘Chameleon Concept’; Comment on “The Politics and Analytics of Health Policy”
Health policy has been termed a ‘chameleon concept’, referring to its ability to take on different forms of disciplinarity as well as different roles and functions. This paper extends Paton’s analysis by exploring the paradox of health policy as a field of academic inquiry—sitting across many of the boundaries of social science but also marginalised by them. It situates contemporary approaches ...
متن کامل