Statement Paul V . Gratz

نویسنده

  • Paul V. Gratz
چکیده

My research in computer architecture focuses on interconnection networks for scalable multi-core and distributed processor microarchitectures. Computer architecture bridges the gap between application and device technology. Application workloads have never been more compute intensive, meanwhile device constraints of power, heat, and reliability have recently forced the computer industry to shift focus from single processor core performance to instantiating multiple processor cores on each chip. As computer architecture enters the era of multi-core, intra-core communication becomes critical to achieve continued increasing system performance. As a graduate student I led the design, implementation and verification for the second level cache and inter-processor network-on-chip (NOC) on the TRIPS processor prototype [2]. Building upon my work on the TRIPS networks-on-chip, my dissertation research explores network utilization efficiency of realistic NOC designs as a means to improve performance and manage power. Looking forward, I plan to focus my future research on closing the expanding gap between application and technology as we move towards chip-multiprocessors (CMPs) with hundreds to thousands of cores. In this statement, I outline the contributions of my dissertation and discuss the direction of my future research.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Branch-directed Data Cache Prefetching Technique for Inorder Processors

A Branch-directed Data Cache Prefetching Technique for Inorder Processors. (December 2011) Reena Panda, B.Tech, NIT Rourkela, India Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Paul V. Gratz Dr. Jiang Hu The increasing gap between processor and main memory speeds has become a serious bottleneck towards further improvement in system performance. Data prefetching techniques have been proposed to hide the...

متن کامل

Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository

The Supreme Court’s affirmative action decisions in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger changed the meaning of “narrow tailoring.” While the narrow tailoring requirement has always had multiple dimensions, a central meaning has been that the government must use the smallest racial preference needed to achieve its compelling interest. We might have expected, therefore, that if the Court ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008