DISCUSSION PAPER PI-9610 Portfolio Choice Models of Pension Funds and Life Assurance Companies: Similarities and Differences
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, we examine pension schemes and life policies in terms of the option features either implicitly or explicitly contained in them. We argue that this greatly simpli®es the process of managing the asset side of pension fund and life company balance sheets. We show that these options need to be either replicated or hedged with an appropriately determined portfolio of cash market and derivative securities. The natural portfolio choice framework for achieving this is asset-liability or surplus risk management. We use this framework to derive a dynamic asset allocation strategy over the lifetime of a pension scheme which involves switching, according to pre-set criteria, between equities, index bonds and conventional bonds. We also use this framework to derive a procedure for hedging the risk faced by life companies from the exercise of the options embodied in their products. We end the paper with an example that applies our dynamic asset allocation strategy to the case of a de®ned bene®t pension scheme. Pension funds and life assurance companies are the principal long-term investing institutions and as such they will have liabilities of the longest duration. These liabilities will also be similar in nature, although there will be qualitative differences, e.g., life policies provide for such features as policy loan and early surrender options in a way that pension funds do not, and de®ned bene®t pension schemes have options on the invested assets in a way that life policies do not. The greatest systematic risk faced by both sets of institutions arises from mismatches of various kinds between assets and liabilities. For example, to minimize the risks associated with maturity mismatching, the two sets of institutions will tend to hold a substantial proportion of long-term assets, such as equities, property and long-term bonds, in their portfolios; although, given the speci®c nature of the options attached to life policies, life companies will hold a relatively larger proportion of more capital-certain assets, such as bonds, in their portfolios than pension funds.
منابع مشابه
Portfolio Choice Models of Pension Funds and Life Assurance Companies: Similarities and Differences
In this paper, we examine pension schemes and life policies in terms of the option features either implicitly or explicitly contained in them. We argue that this greatly simpli®es the process of managing the asset side of pension fund and life company balance sheets. We show that these options need to be either replicated or hedged with an appropriately determined portfolio of cash market and d...
متن کاملFilip Chybalski
The last ten years of the 20 century was the decade of pension reforms in Central and Eastern European countries. A three-pillar pension system has been adopted in most of that countries, including Poland, where the second pillar is created by open pension funds (OFEs), managed by pension fund companies (PTEs). The aim of this article is to identify and analyze barriers to the increased effecti...
متن کاملQuality of Life among Older Adults Covered by Various Pension Funds, Tabriz, Iran
Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) is known to be one of the main challenges of the present century in the growing heterogeneous elder population. Therefore, determining the affecting factors of QoL among older people could be imperative. The present study aims at the comparative investigation of the QoL the old people covered by the various pension funds in the city of Tabriz, Iran. ...
متن کاملPI - 0303 Institutional Investors , Financial Market Efficiency and Financial Stability
ing from the likely increase in saving and wealth, the implications of growth in institutions, notably life insurers and pension funds, for financing patterns arise from differences in behaviour from the personal sector, which would otherwise hold assets directly. As we showed in Tables 7-9, portfolios of long-term institutions vary widely, but in most cases, they hold a greater proportion of c...
متن کاملProcyclicality and structural trends in investment allocation by insurance companies and pension funds: A Discussion Paper by the Bank of England and the Procyclicality Working Group
Any views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and the Procyclicality Working Group and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bank of England 2 Foreword 1. In early 2013, the Bank established the Procyclicality Working Group (the membership of which is set out overleaf) to examine the question of whether, and if so why, insurance companies and pension funds invest procyclica...
متن کامل