A Comparison of Two Evidential Reasoning Schemes

نویسنده

  • Chia-Hoang Lee
چکیده

[1] advocate the use of Dempster-Shafer (0-5) theory in evidence-gathering process. It is stated that they are unaware of any formal model which could allow inexact reasoning at whatever level of abstraction. [2] later shows how evidential reasoning can be conducted in the same hypolhesis space using a Bayesian model. The purpose of this note is to examine the difference of theses two schemes, and to point out certain inconsistencies of this Bayesian model with the motives behind the use of D-S model.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comprehensive Decision Modeling of Reverse Logistics System: A Multi-criteria Decision Making Model by using Hybrid Evidential Reasoning Approach and TOPSIS (TECHNICAL NOTE)

In the last two decades, product recovery systems have received increasing attention due to several reasons such as new governmental regulations and economic advantages. One of the most important activities of these systems is to assign returned products to suitable reverse manufacturing alternatives. Uncertainty of returned products in terms of quantity, quality, and time complicates the decis...

متن کامل

Modelling the Level of Adoption of Analytical Tools; An Implementation of Multi-Criteria Evidential Reasoning

In the future, competitive advantages will be given to organisations that can extract valuable information from massive data and make better decisions. In most cases, this data comes from multiple sources. Therefore, the challenge is to aggregate them into a common framework in order to make them meaningful and useful.This paper will first review the most important multi-criteria decision analy...

متن کامل

Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes

In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reasoning may be analysed in a dialectical way by means of critical questions that point to typical sources of doubt. We discuss critical questions about the evidential arguments adduced, about the narrative accounts of the facts considered, and about the way in which the arguments and narratives are...

متن کامل

AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning1

This paper reports on the ongoing development of a collaborative, webbased application for argument visualization named AVER (Argument Visualization for Evidential Reasoning). It is targeted at police officers who may use it to express their reasoning about a case based on evidence. AVER provides an interface which supports the construction and visualization of argument graphs and handles more ...

متن کامل

Discounting and Combination Operations in Evidential Reasoning

Evidential reasoning is now a leading topic in Artificial Intelligence. Evidence is repre­ sented by a variety of evidential functions. Evidential reasoning is carried out by cer­ tain kinds of fundamental operation on these functions. This paper discusses two of the basic operations on evidential functions, the discount operation and the well-known or­ thogonal sum operation. We show that the ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Artif. Intell.

دوره 35  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1988