Methods of Privatization: Auctions, Bargaining, and Give-aways Non-technical Summary
نویسندگان
چکیده
The paper surveys recent results of auction theory, bargaining theory and political economy in order to compare di erent methods of privatization. We assume that a government is not only interested in maximizing revenues from privatization but also in achieving an e cient allocation of ownership rights. We show that these two goals may be in con ict with each other. However, we argue that in a wide variety of circumstances the government should use an ascending open bid format, such as the traditional English auction. In particular, if there are more than two serious bidders, an English auction is more e cient and yields higher revenues than bargaining with a preselected buyer. Finally, if the government has to mass privatize, we show that giving away some fraction of all shares to the general population may be more e cient and yield higher revenues than a policy of selling all rms to the highest bidder. JEL classification numbers: C78, D44, D72.
منابع مشابه
Equitable Risk Allocation in Construction Projects: Fuzzy Bargaining Game Approach
An equitable risk allocation between contracting parties plays a vital role in enhancing the performance of the project. This research presents a new quantitative risk allocation approach by integrating fuzzy logic and bargaining game theory. Owing to the imprecise and uncertain nature of players’ payoffs at different risk allocation strategies, fuzzy logic is implemented to determine the value...
متن کاملThe Evolutionary Stability of Auctions over Bargaining
This paper considers equilibrium in transaction mechanisms. In an environment with homogeneous buyers and sellers, which eliminates the advantage auctions possess of matching buyers and sellers, both auctions and bargaining are equilibria. However, only auctions are evolutionarily stable. This identifies a new advantage of auctions over bargaining, arising from the division of the gains from tr...
متن کاملThe Role of Labor Market Participation on Marriage Bargaining – Identification through Intergenerational Transfers
This paper provides insights into the determinants of marriage bargaining by analyzing withincouple negotiation for the share of family resources allocated to each of the spouse’s old-age parents. The focal question is the extent to which spousal labor market participation affects her bargaining power. The study is based on a unique Chinese household level survey data. To account for the potent...
متن کاملLearning and Investing during Transition: Evidence from Naturally-Occurring Auctions
This paper considers investing made by ordinary citizens in a mass privatization in which they had strong incentives to learn. To detect and quantify learning we develop new measure of individual performance during the bidding process at a proxy stock market where prices vary over successive stages of bidding. We present evidence that learning took place among uninformed heterogeneous agents du...
متن کاملAuctions Versus Negotiations Revisited∗
Auctions are compared with different forms of negotiation and bargaining. The value of an extra customer is shown to exceed the value of being able to ration supply, if the seller is otherwise unconstrained. Thus, we generalize and provide a simple proof of a result due to Bulow and Klemperer (1996), in which auctions and negotiations are compared. We also compare auctions and seller-offer barg...
متن کامل