THIS IS A DRAFT VERSION – PLEASE DON’T QUOTE OR CIRCULATE WITHOUT PERMISSION Wittgenstein reads Heidegger, Heidegger reads Wittgenstein: Thinking Language Bounding World
نویسنده
چکیده
This is a tale of two readings, and of a non-encounter, the missed encounter between two philosophers whose legacy, as has been noted, might jointly define the scope of problems and questions left open, in the wake of the twentieth century, for philosophy today. In particular, I will discuss today two remarks, one by Wittgenstein on Heidegger, and the other by Heidegger on Wittgenstein; as far as I know, the first is the only recorded remark by Wittgenstein about Heidegger, and the second is one of only two by Heidegger about Wittgenstein. 1 As readings, both remarks that I shall discuss are, at best, partial, elliptical, and glancing. Interestingly, as I shall argue, each is actually a suggestive misreading of the one philosopher by the other. By considering these two misreadings, I shall argue, we can understand better the relationship between the two great twentieth century investigators of the obscure linkages among being, language and truth. And we can gain some insight into some of the many questions still left open by the many failed encounters of twentieth century philosophy, up to and including what might be considered the most definitive encounter that is still routinely missed, miscarried, or misunderstood, the encounter between the “traditions” of “analytic” and “continental” philosophy, which are still widely supposed to be disjoint.
منابع مشابه
The Sense of Finitude and the Finitude of Sense
For Martin Heidegger in Being and Time, human existence (Dasein) is essentially finite in its directedness toward death as a final and unavoidable individuating possibility. In Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Heidegger further specifies the finitude of Dasein, following Kant, as the capacity to be affected by external objects, which gives rise to the temporal problem of the relationship be...
متن کاملThinking and Being: Heidegger and Wittgenstein on Machination and Lived-Experience
Heidegger’s treatment of ‘machination’ in the Beiträge zur Philosophie begins the critique of technological thinking that would centrally characterize his later work. Unlike later discussions of technology, the critique of machination in Beiträge connects its arising to the predominance of ‘lived-experience’ (Erlebnis) as the concealed basis for the possibility of a pre-delineated, rule-based m...
متن کاملAlternative Gmm Methods for Nonlinear Panel Data Models: Asymptotic Eeciency versus Small Sample Performance
Preliminary draft, comments welcome (Please do not quote or circulate without permission of the authors)
متن کاملThe Saying/Showing Distinction in Early Wittgenstein and Its Implications
Jafar Morvarid[1] In this paper, I shall try to clarify the saying/showing distinction and to emphasize the role of this distinction in constructing a coherent picture of language and the world. In order to properly understand the differences between the sayable and the showable, I will throw light on the limits of language and the world. I will explain why it is impossible to say the showab...
متن کاملHeidegger, Mood and the Lived Body: The Ontical and the Ontological
It is sometimes said that Heidegger neglected the ontological significance of the lived body until the Zollikon Seminars, where he elaborates on the bodily aspect of Being-inthe-world as a “bodying forth.” Against such a contention, in this article I argue that, because of the central role that Heidegger grants to mood (disclosive affectivity) as a primordial way of disclosing Being-in-the-worl...
متن کامل