Hayat Khan Modeling Social Preferences: A Generalized Model of Inequity Aversion Economics and Econometrics Research Institute EERI
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper argues that a generalized model of social preferences must simultaneously pass two tests; the Variety Test (explain outcomes under variety, the V-test) and the Psychological Test (conform to psychological intuition, the P-test). It is shown that none of the models proposed to date unconditionally passes these tests. The paper extends the Fehr and Schmidt model of inequality-aversion to a generalized model of inequity-aversion which parsimoniously explains interior outcomes in the dictator game and dynamics of outcomes in other games. This is done through introducing the equity-bias in the Fehr and Schmidt model. The paper postulates that a player’s idea of equitable distribution is state-dependent, where the state is determined by psychological and structural parameters. The state could be fair, superior or inferior. Individuals in a fair state have zero equity-bias and split the pie evenly. Those in a superior (inferior) state have positive (negative) equity-bias and value more (less) than fair distribution as equitable. JEL Classification: C69; C70; C91; D03; D63; D64
منابع مشابه
Modeling Social Preferences: A Generalized Model of Inequity Aversion
Taking note of the wide variety and growing list of models in the literature to explain patterns of behavior observed in laboratory experiments, this paper identifies two tests, the Variety Test (ability of a model to explain outcomes under variety or alternative scenarios) and the Psychological Test (ability of a model to conform to psychological intuition), that can be used to judge any model...
متن کاملOn Modeling Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods
This paper addresses four stylized facts that summarize data from experimental studies of voluntary contributions to provision of public goods. Theoretical propositions and testable hypotheses for voluntary contributions are derived from two models of social preferences, the inequity aversion model and the egocentric other-regarding preferences model. We nd that the egocentric other-regardin...
متن کاملGroupy and Non-Groupy Behavior: Deconstructing Bias in Social Preferences
This paper deconstructs social preferences in group contexts and resolves the contradiction between laboratory findings of inequity aversion and the destructive reality of group conflict. The paper replicates previous results that subjects are—on average—inequity averse towards out-group participants and more so towards in-group. However, the mean is not representative. Using a with-in subject ...
متن کاملOn Inequity Aversion A Reply to Binmore and Shaked
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked’s criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social preferences.
متن کاملThe Role of Equality and Efficiency in Social Preferences
Engelmann and Strobel (AER 2004) question the relevance of inequity aversion in simple dictator game experiments claiming that a combination of a preference for efficiency and a Rawlsian motive for helping the least well-off is more important than inequity aversion. We show that these results are partly based on a strong subject pool effect. The participants of the E&S experiments were undergra...
متن کامل