Evaluation of the roughness of composite resins submitted to different surface treatments.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of restorative composite resins after polishing with aluminum oxide discs and applying an adhesive layer The following composite resins were used: Filtek Z250 (hybrid, 3MESPE, A2) and Filtek Supreme XT (nanofilled, 3M ESPE, A2E). Thirty specimens of each composite were made using a condensation silicone mold (5.0 x 2.0 mm) into which the composites were inserted and submitted to light pressure. After polymerization using the halogen light source Curing Light 2500 (3M) for 40 seconds, the specimens were assigned to the following groups: G1-Z250/CO- control, did not receive any treatment; G2-Z250/SL--the specimens underwent finishing and polishing with Sof-Lex discs; G3-Z250/ADE, application of an adhesive layer on the top of the specimen and light curing for 20 seconds. Groups G4, G5 and G6 followed the same treatment sequence, but using Filtek Supreme XT The specimens were stored in deionized water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Three readings of surface roughness were made for each specimen. The results were submitted to variance analysis by Two-Way ANOVA Test and Tukey HSD Test. The mean values obtained were: G3 (0.2325 +/- 0.1484 microm) and G6 (0.2266 +/- 0.0463 microm), which were higher than the other groups and did not differ statistically from each other. Groups G1 (0.1023 +/- 0.0464 microm), G4 (0.1083 +/- 0.0241 microm), G5 (0.1160 +/- 0.0252 microm) and G2 (0.1360 +/- 0.0131 microm) had the lowest average roughness and did not differ statistically among each other. It was concluded that the Sof-Lex discs performed better for the surface treatment of the composites resins tested, producing similar values of surface roughness for both composites. Covering with dentin adhesive increased the surface roughness in both composites.
منابع مشابه
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Three Different Composite Resins Following Polishing with a Two-Step Technique
Background and Aim: Nowadays, demand for same–color restorative materials, especially resin composites, is increasing. Access to the smooth surface with minimum level of surface roughness significantly results in more beauty, and the reduction of the accumulation of the plaque, gingival inflammation, and tooth discoloration. the aim of this study was surface roughness of three different composi...
متن کاملSurface Roughness of Composite Resins after Simulated Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate, in vitro, the surface roughness of two composite resins submitted to simulated toothbrushing with three different dentifrices. MATERIALS AND METHODS Totally, 36 samples of Z350XT and 36 samples of Empress Direct were built and randomly divided into three groups (n = 12) according to the dentifrice used (Oral-B Pro-Health Whitening [OBW], Colgat...
متن کاملEffect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Microhybrid Composites
The use of composite resins in dentistry is well accepted for restoring anterior and posterior teeth. Many polishing protocols have been evaluated for their effect on the surface roughness of restorative materials. This study compared the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. Thirty-six specimens were prepared for each composite $#91;Charisma ...
متن کاملInfluence of Different Bleaching Agents on Surface Roughness of Composite Resins Filling
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of one in-office and two home bleaching agents on the surface roughness of a hybrid, microhybrid and nanohybrid composite resin. Three composite resins (Valux Plus, 3M ESPE, Filtek Z 250, 3M ESPE, and Herculite XRV Ultra, Kerr) and three bleaching agents (Opalescence PF, Ultradent Products, Perfect Bleach, Voco, and Perfect BleachOffice +, Voco)...
متن کاملEffect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
This study examined the average surface roughness (Ra, microm) of 2 microfilled (Durafill and Perfection), 1 hybrid (Filtek Z250) and 2 packable composite resins (Surefil and Fill Magic), before (baseline) and after eight different finishing and polishing treatments. The surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Ten specimens of each composite resin were randomly subjected to one of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL
دوره 25 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012