Cost-sharing: effects on spending and outcomes.
نویسنده
چکیده
As health reform drives the largest expansion of health insurance since Medicare and policy-makers grapple with how to slow the increase in health care spending, cost-sharing--the division of health care costs between patients and insurers--is considered an important tool. This synthesis reviews the evidence on cost-sharing. Key findings include: Research consistently shows demand for health care is price sensitive, but it is unlikely cost-sharing will significantly slow the growth of health care spending. Almost 50 percent of costs are associated with the 5 percent of the population facing serious medical conditions. Studies show these patients rely on their doctors to guide treatment decisions. Increased cost-sharing may shift the financial burden from insurers and public payers to patients. Patients are not able to discern between appropriate and inappropriate care in response to increased cost-sharing. For the average person, increased cost-sharing may not adversely affect their health, but for vulnerable populations, increased cost-sharing is associated with adverse health outcomes. Low-income populations are disproportionately affected by increased cost-sharing. People in poor health respond differently to cost-sharing changes than healthy people. Finally, cost-sharing is not well-targeted on low-value services making it difficult for patients to make appropriate decisions.
منابع مشابه
Recent proposals to limit Medigap coverage and modify Medicare cost sharing.
As policymakers look for savings from the Medicare program, some have proposed eliminating or discouraging "first-dollar coverage" available through privately purchased Medigap policies. Medigap coverage, which beneficiaries obtain to protect themselves from Medicare's cost-sharing requirements and its lack of a cap on out-of-pocket spending, may discourage the judicious use of medical services...
متن کاملEvaluating Rationality in Responses to Health Insurance Cost-Sharing: Comparing Deductibles and Copayments
Many studies find that consumers reduce spending in response to higher health insurance cost-sharing, but there is mixed evidence as to whether these spending reductions reflect a rational trade-off between health benefits and costs. This paper provides new evidence on the rationality of consumer responses to cost-sharing using novel variation in two common types of cost-sharing incentives: ded...
متن کاملCost - sharing : Effects on spending and outcomes
The author maintains responsibility for any errors in the interpretations of the research findings. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the commenters.
متن کاملHealth benefits of reduced patient cost sharing in Japan.
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect on out-of-pocket medical spending and physical and mental health of Japan's reduction in health-care cost sharing from 30% to 10% when people turn 70 years of age. METHODS Study data came from a 2007 nationally-representative cross-sectional survey of 10 293 adults aged 64 to 75 years. Physical health was assessed using a 16-point scale based on self-reported da...
متن کاملStudying the impact of quantity discount contract and cost-sharing contract on a two-echelon green supply chain profit
The members of a chain always try to find new ways in order to raise their profit. Hence we intend to study two different scenarios in a single item two-echelon green supply chain including two manufacturers and one retailer to study the effects of two effective contracts on members’ profit. Two scenarios are discussed and in first one, first manufacturer proposes quantity discount contract to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report
دوره 20 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010