Commitment in Alternating O¤ers Bargaining
نویسندگان
چکیده
We extend the Ståhl-Rubinstein alternating-o¤er bargaining procedure to allow players, prior to each bargaining round, to simultaneously and visibly commit to some share of the pie. If commitment costs are small but increasing in the committed share, then the unique outcome consistent with common belief in future rationality (Perea, 2010), or more restrictively subgame perfect Nash equilibrium, exhibits a second mover advantage. In particular, as the smallest share of the pie approaches zero, the horizon approaches in nity, and commitment costs approach zero, the unique bargaining outcome corresponds to the reversed Rubinstein outcome ( =(1 + ); 1=(1 + )), where is the common discount factor.
منابع مشابه
Commitment in alternating offers bargaining
We extend the Ståhl-Rubinstein alternating-o¤er bargaining procedure to allow players, prior to each bargaining round, to simultaneously and visibly commit to some share of the pie. If commitment costs are small but increasing in the committed share, then the unique outcome consistent with common belief in future rationality (Perea, 2009), or more restrictively subgame perfect Nash equilibrium,...
متن کاملSome Have a Talent for Bargaining and Some Dont
In Bargaining Theory players di¤er from one another in either their valuation for the negotiated object and/or their time preferences. We suggest a model that incorporates "bargaining ability" as another source for heterogeneity across players. This bargaining ability for the buyer determines how many o¤ers he will be able to turn down before he walks away. For the seller this ability determine...
متن کاملCoordination and bargaining power in contracting with externalities
Building on Genicot and Ray (2006) we develop a model on non-cooperative bargaining that combines the two main approaches in the literature of contracting with externalities: the o¤er game (in which the principal makes simultaneous o¤ers to the agents) and the bidding game (in which the agents make simultaneous o¤ers to the principal). Allowing for agent coordination, we show that the outcome o...
متن کاملReputational Bargaining under Knowledge of Rationality
Two players announce bargaining postures to which they may become committed and then bargain over the division of a surplus. The share of the surplus that a player can guarantee herself under rst-order knowledge of rationality is determined (as a function of her probability of becoming committed), as is the bargaining posture that she must announce in order to guarantee herself this much. This...
متن کاملReputational bargaining and deadlines
How will agents behave when bargaining in the face of an upcoming deadline? If irrational types exist, committed to their bargaining positions, rational agents will imitate this tough behavior to gain reputational benefits, even though this may result in the deadline being missed. Notably, if agents are patient and irrational types are committed to fixed demands then agreement must necessarily ...
متن کامل