Physics and Philosophy
نویسندگان
چکیده
A winner of the Nobel Prize, Werner Heisenberg was born in 1901 in Wurzberg, Germany. He studied physics at the University of Munich and for his Ph.D. wrote a dissertation on turbulence in fluid streams. Interested in Niels Bohrs account of the planetary atom, Heisenberg studied under Max Born at the University of Gottingen and then, in 1924, went to the Universitets Institut for Teoretisk Fysik in Copenhagen, where he studied under Bohr. In 1925 he published a paper, `About the Quantum-theoretical Reinterpretation of Kinetic and Mechanical Relationships', in which he proposed a reinterpretation of the basic concepts of mechanics, and this was followed by the publication of his indeterminacy principle in 1927. In that year he became professor at the University of Leipzig and held the post until 1941, when he was appointed director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physics in Berlin. After the war he organized and became director of the Max Planck Institute for Physics and Astrophysics at Gottingen, later moving with the institute, in 1958, to Munich. As a public figure, he actively promoted the peaceful use of atomic power and, in 1957, led other German scientists in opposing a move to equip the West German army with nuclear weapons. In 1970 he became Director Emeritus of the Max Planck Institute. Heisenberg was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1932 and received numerous other honours. He died in 1976.
منابع مشابه
Causality from western empiricism viewpoint, and its critique from transcendent philosophy viewpoint
Causality and its aspects is one of the fundamental issues in Islamic and western philosophy. In the modern west, some empirical philosophers like, Locke, Berkeley and Hume by empirical attitude challenged causality, that this subject is related to their epistemological principles in approach to objective and subjective facts, means empirical base of knowledge. Hence these philosophers denie...
متن کاملمعماری طبایع: تبیین رویکردی دربارۀ نسبت انسان و محیط مصنوع بر مبنای چهارگانهها
This paper provides a new system of understanding the relationship of man and the built environment. This new system is adopted from Iranian traditional medicine, which is based on philosophy of physics and traditional wisdom. In wisdom and medicine alike, anything manifested in the material world—such as humans, artifacts, and everything in their surrounding environment—has qualiti...
متن کاملThe Coherence and Incoherence among the Order of Effusion, Physics, and Ancient Astronomy from the Perspective of Muslim Philosophers
The present article deals with coherence and incoherence among the theories of the order of effusion, physics and ancient astronomy. There is no coherence between these fields in the view of Plotinus who is the innovator of the theory of effusion, while there is a coherence and correlation among these orders in Farabichr('39')s philosophy. In this regard Ibn Sina, Ikhwan al-Safa , Shaykh al-...
متن کاملHow to Escape Irrelevance: Performance Philosophy, Public Philosophy and Borderless Philosophy
Carlo Cellucci has rightly pointed out that contemporary professional academic philosophy has a serious problem of irrelevance. Performance philosophy and public philosophy are two recent attempts to solve that problem and radically transform professional academic philosophy into what I call real philosophy. Nevertheless, performance philosophy and public philosophy have some prima facie probl...
متن کاملA Package of Positions in the Philosophy of Physics
This is a very useful and easily assimilated summary of recent work in the philosophy of physics. It focuses on four areas: philosophy of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (David Wallace), foundations of statistical mechanics (Roman Frigg), philosophical aspects of quantum information theory (Chris Timpson), and current approaches to quantum gravity (Dean Rickles). The intended audience is ‘‘b...
متن کاملThe Physics and Metaphysics of Time
We review the current situation in the philosophy of time, partly to investigate Michael Dummett’s complaint that the philosophy of physics has become too specialized and technical to be able to communicate with mainstream philosophy. We conclude that the situation in this case is different: there is no special diffi culty of intelligibility – the obstacle for communication between science and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005