Belief Revision
نویسنده
چکیده
Philippa, a Greek nineteen year old student at Patras University, has just discovered that Nikos and Angela are not her true parents; she was adopted when she was six months old from an orphanage in Sao Paulo. The news really shook Philippa. Much of what she used to believe all her life about herself and her family was wrong. After recovering from the initial shock she started putting her thoughts back in order: so that means that Alexandros is not really her cousin, and she did not take her brown eyes from (who she used to believe was) her grandmother, and she no longer needs to worry about developing high blood pressure because of the bad family history from both Nikos’ and Angela’s side. Moreover, she probably has siblings somewhere in Brazil, and if she really looked into it, she might be entitled to a Brazilian citizenship which could come in handy for that long trip she always wanted to make to Latin America. This is a typical (although rather dramatic) instance of a belief revision scenario: a rational agent receives new information that makes her change her beliefs. In the principal case where the new information contradicts her initial belief state, the agent needs to withdraw some of the old beliefs before she can accommodate the new information; she also needs to accept the consequences that might result from the interaction of the new information with the (remaining) old beliefs. The study of the process of belief revision, which gave rise to an exciting research area with the same name1, can be traced back to the early 1980s. The article that is widely considered to mark the birth of the field is the seminal work of Alchourron, Gardenfors, and Makinson reported in [1]. As a matter of fact, the framework that evolved from [1] – now known as the AGM paradigm (or simply AGM) after the initials of its three founders – is to this date the dominant framework in Belief Revision. Of course much has happened since 1985. The formal apparatus developed in [1] has been enhanced and thoroughly studied, new research directions have emerged from
منابع مشابه
Revocable Belief Revision
Krister Segerberg proposed irrevocable belief revision, to be contrasted with standard belief revision, in a setting wherein belief of propositional formulas is modelled explicitly. This suggests that in standard belief revision is revocable: one should be able to unmake (‘revoke’) the fresh belief in the revision formula, given yet further information that contradicts it. In a dynamic epistemi...
متن کاملPermissive Belief Revision
We point out that current belief revision operations can be used to revise non-monotonic theories and we propose a new operation, called permissive belief revision. The underlying idea of permissive belief revision consists of instead of abandoning some beliefs during a revision, transforming those beliefs into weaker ones, while still keeping the resulting belief set consistent. This framework...
متن کاملThe dynamics of relevance: adaptive belief revision
This paper presents eight (previously unpublished) adaptive logics for belief revision, each of which define a belief revision operation in the sense of the AGM framework. All these revision operations are shown to satisfy the six basic AGM postulates for belief revision, and Parikh’s axiom of Relevance. Using one of these logics as an example, we show how their proof theory gives a more dynami...
متن کاملAnytime Belief Revision
Belief Revision is a ubiquitous process underlying many forms of intelligent behaviour. The AGM paradigm is a powerful framework for modeling and implementing belief revision systems based on the principle of Minimal Change; it provides a rich and rigorous foundation for computer-based belief revision architectures. Maxi-adjustment is a belief revision strategy for theory bases that can be impl...
متن کاملBelief revision in the propositional closure of a qualitative algebra (extended version)
Belief revision is an operation that aims at modifying old beliefs so that they become consistent with new ones. The issue of belief revision has been studied in various formalisms, in particular, in qualitative algebras (QAs) in which the result is a disjunction of belief bases that is not necessarily representable in a QA. This motivates the study of belief revision in formalisms extending QA...
متن کاملCharacterizing Relevant Belief Revision Operators
This paper introduces a framework for relevant belief revision. We represent agent’s beliefs in prime implicants and express agent’s preference on beliefs as a pre-order over terms. We define a belief revision operator via minimising the change of the prime implicants of the existing beliefs and the incoming information with respect to agent’s preferences. We show that such a belief revision op...
متن کامل