Some Counterclaims Undermine Themselves in Observational Studies
نویسنده
چکیده
Claims based on observational studies that a treatment has certain effects are often met with counterclaims asserting that the treatment is entirely without effect, that all associations with treatment are produced by biased treatment assignment. Some counterclaims undermine themselves in the following specific sense: presuming the counterclaim to be true may strengthen the support that the original data provide for the original claim, so that the counterclaim fails in its role as a critique of the original claim. In mathematics, a proof by contradiction supposes a proposition to be true en route to proving that the proposition is false. Analogously, the supposition that a particular counterclaim is true may justify an otherwise unjustified statistical analysis, and this added analysis may interpret the original data as providing even stronger support for the original claim. More precisely, the original study is sensitive to unmeasured biases of a particular magnitude, Γ, but an analysis that supposes the counterclaim to be true may be insensitive to much larger unmeasured biases, Γ′ > Γ. Illustrated using data from the US Fatal Accident Reporting System.
منابع مشابه
بررسی کیفیت گزارش نتایج مطالعات کوهورت قبل از صدور بیانیه STROBE
Background & Objectives: Observational studies are not often reported in detail and clear enough, so that assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of these studies is not straightforward. To improve the reporting of observational studies, a checklist of items called ‘Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology’ (STROBE) was developed by some experts in October 2007. T...
متن کاملOrder on Plaintiffs' and Third-Party Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant PRG's Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims (PAYLESS CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.)
متن کامل
معرفی دستورالعمل ارتقاء گزارشدهی مطالعات مشاهدهای در اپیدمیولوژی
Background and Objective: Studies in the health sciences is comprised of observational and intervention. A major part of health sciences research has been allocated to the observational studies. Designing and doing studies based on scientific guidelines that include the entire process, leads to studies validation and also results can be generalized to the community. Thus, for standardizing ...
متن کاملSome thoughts about resilience versus positive development, main effects versus interactions, and the value of resilience.
Interaction effects are the defining feature of resilience and resilience research and are responsible for the unique contributions of this field of study to our understanding of human development. The methodological and statistical challenges posed by interaction effects do not, by themselves, undermine the value of resilience as a construct.
متن کامل