The Selective Advantage of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Salmonella.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The genetic code in mRNA is redundant, with 61 sense codons translated into 20 different amino acids. Individual amino acids are encoded by up to six different codons but within codon families some are used more frequently than others. This phenomenon is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias. The genomes of free-living unicellular organisms such as bacteria have an extreme codon usage bias and the degree of bias differs between genes within the same genome. The strong positive correlation between codon usage bias and gene expression levels in many microorganisms is attributed to selection for translational efficiency. However, this putative selective advantage has never been measured in bacteria and theoretical estimates vary widely. By systematically exchanging optimal codons for synonymous codons in the tuf genes we quantified the selective advantage of biased codon usage in highly expressed genes to be in the range 0.2-4.2 x 10-4 per codon per generation. These data quantify for the first time the potential for selection on synonymous codon choice to drive genome-wide sequence evolution in bacteria, and in particular to optimize the sequences of highly expressed genes. This quantification may have predictive applications in the design of synthetic genes and for heterologous gene expression in biotechnology.
منابع مشابه
Identification of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in the Pseudorabies Virus UL31 Gene
Background: Little knowledge of synonymous codon usage pattern of pseudorabies virus (PRV) genome, especially the UL31 gene in the process for its evolution is available. Objectives: In the present study, the codon usage bias between PRV UL31 sequence and the UL31-like sequences was identified. Materials and Methods: We used a comprehensive analysi...
متن کاملMutational Pressure Drives Evolution of Synonymous Codon Usage in Genetically Distinct Oenothera plastomes
Background: Most of the amino acids are encoded by more than one codon, termed as synonymous codons. Synonymous codon usage is not random as it is unique to species. In each amino acid family, some synonymous codons are preferred and this is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias (SCUB). Trends associated with evolution of SCUB and factors influencing its diversification in plastomes of gen...
متن کاملThe rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias.
Genes sequences from Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and other members of the Enterobacteriaceae show a negative correlation between the degree of synonymous-codon usage bias and the rate of nucleotide substitution at synonymous sites. In particular, very highly expressed genes have very biased codon usage and accumulate synonymous substitutions very slowly. In contrast, there is litt...
متن کاملSelection intensity for codon bias.
The patterns of nonrandom usage of synonymous codons (codon bias) in enteric bacteria were analyzed. Poisson random field (PRF) theory was used to derive the expected distribution of frequencies of nucleotides differing from the ancestral state at aligned sites in a set of DNA sequences. This distribution was applied to synonymous nucleotide polymorphisms and amino acid polymorphisms in the gnd...
متن کاملNucleotide substitution rate estimation in enterobacteria: approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to similar conclusions.
Synonymous mutations are ‘‘silent’’ with regard to the amino acid sequence of a protein, but a wealth of evidence indicates that, at least in species with large effective population sizes, synonymous mutations are subject to translational selection (Akashi and EyreWalker 1998). One line of evidence for translational selection has been the perceived negative correlation between codon bias and sy...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- PLoS genetics
دوره 12 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016