Semantic Macroroles in Role and Reference Grammar
نویسنده
چکیده
Issues regarding the nature of the semantic relationships holding between a verb (or other predicating element) and its arguments have been the focus of much research and controversy since the mid-1960’s. Starting from Gruber (1965)’s notion of thematic relations and Fillmore (1968)’s concept of case roles, most contemporary theories of grammar assume some system of semantic predicate-argument relations. Most theories assume a set of thematic relations such as agent, patient, theme, instrument, etc. which map into a set of grammatical relations (e.g. Lexical-Functional Grammar) or structural positions in clauses (Government & Binding Theory). Role and Reference Grammar [RRG] (Van Valin 1993, in press; Van Valin & LaPolla 1997) has taken a somewhat different approach to this aspect of the syntax-semantics interface. In some of the earliest work in the theory (Van Valin 1977), it was proposed that there are two types of semantic relationships holding between predicates and their arguments: the familiar thematic relations like agent, experiencer, patient, etc., as well as a second, more general type of semantic role, of which there are only two, termed actor and undergoer. The latter type of role was labelled semantic macroroles. Originally unique to RRG, this notion has been picked up and developed in different ways in a variety of approaches.1 The purpose of this paper is to elucidate the RRG concept of semantic macrorole. The discussion will proceed as follows. In the next section, the semantic basis of the distinction between actor and undergoer will be clarified, and in the following section, the function of semantic macroroles in the RRG linking system will be discussed. In the final section, the issue of how many macroroles there should be will be addressed.
منابع مشابه
Discrete Entailment - based Linking and - ee Nouns in English
Barker (1998) argues that since the referent of an -ee noun can be an indirect object, a direct object, a prepositional object, or a subject, -ee nouns cannot be described as a syntactic natural class. Portero Muñoz (2003) concurs and offers a semantic analysis based on Logical Structure (LS) in the framework of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). This article proposes that RRG’s macroroles (Acto...
متن کاملThe Effects of Guided and Unguided Semantic Mapping on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary and Grammar Knowledge
متن کامل
Generalized Semantic Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface
Generalized semantic roles, variously known as semantic macroroles or proto-roles, play a central role in the syntax-semantics interface in many monostratal syntactic theories. This paper reviews the major phenomena which have motivated the postulation of generalized semantic roles and evaluates critically some of the specific proposals that have been made, with special focus on the function th...
متن کاملA Constraint-Based Typology of Case Systems
This dissertation proposes an Optimality-Theoretic [OT] (Prince and Smolensky 1993) account of case systems and explores its typological scope, with a particular focus on four accusative languages, Korean, Japanese, Icelandic, and Imbabura Quechua. There are three major claims to be made here. First, the typological variation of case systems is derived from re-ranking of a small number of indiv...
متن کاملاستخراج بیناظر ظرفیت فعل در زبان فارسی
Valency is the key concept in dependency grammar. Among all word categories, verbs are the most important categories with a key role in syntax and semantics. Verb is the central role in a sentence and acts as the main semantic component in the dependency grammar. In this paper, after studying several methods for unsupervised discovery of Persian verb valency, the ambiguities are studied. Among ...
متن کامل