Extracting Finite Sets of Entailments from OWL Ontologies
نویسندگان
چکیده
The canonical standard description logic reasoning service is classification, that is, the generation of the set of atomic subsumptions which are entailed by some ontology. While this consequence relation is well defined and finite, there is significant variance in the composition of that set. For example, it is common (in tools and in discussion) to exclude some tautologies (e.g., A v >, A v A). While for many purposes such divergences are harmless, there are many for which precision about what appears in the classification is essential, for example, estimating differences in logical content. In this paper, we propose definitions for different types of finite entailment sets of an OWL ontology based on the transitive closure and transitive reduction of its asserted and inferred class graphs. The purpose of this work is to introduce a flexible and extensible specification for selecting a particular set of entailments, with the aim of ensuring the correctness and replicability of OWL-based applications.
منابع مشابه
Declutter Your Justifications: Determining Similarity Between OWL Explanations
Given the high expressivity of the Web Ontology Language OWL 2, there is a potential for great diversity in the logical content of OWL ontologies. The fact that many naturally occurring entailments of such ontologies have multiple justifications indicates that ontologies often overdetermine their consequences, suggesting a diversity in supporting reasons. On closer inspection, however, we often...
متن کاملUnderstanding Entailments in OWL
This paper describes the explanation in OWL landscape. In recent years there has been huge progress, both in theory and implementation, in the area of explaining the causes of entailments in OWL ontologies. This paper charts the course of explanation in OWL and then looks at ways in which user understanding of ontologies might be further improved. Specifically, the use of fine-grained justifica...
متن کاملThe OWL Explanation Workbench: A toolkit for working with justifications for entailments in OWL ontologies
In this article we present the Explanation Workbench, a library and tool for working with justification-based explanations of entailments in OWL ontologies. The workbench comprises a software library and Protégé plugin. The library can be used in standalone OWL API based applications that require the ability to generate and consume justifications. The Protégé plugin, which is underpinned by the...
متن کاملJustification Patterns for OWL DL Ontologies
For debugging OWL-DL ontologies, natural language explanations of inconsistencies and undesirable entailments are of great help. From such explanations, ontology developers can learn why an ontology gives rise to specific entailments. Unfortunately, commonly used tableaux-based reasoning services do not provide a basis for such explanations, since they rely on a refutation proof strategy and no...
متن کاملExplaining Inconsistencies in OWL Ontologies
Justifications play a central role as the basis for explaining entailments in OWL ontologies. While techniques for computing justifications for entailments in consistent ontologies are theoretically and practically well-understood, little is known about the practicalities of computing justifications for inconsistent ontologies. This is despite the fact that justifications are important for repa...
متن کامل