Hypotheticals, psychiatric testimony, and the death sentence.
نویسنده
چکیده
"Doctor ... do you have an opinion within reasonable psychiatric certainty whether or not there is a probability that the defendant. . . will commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society?" "Yes, he most certainly would." "Would you state whether or not that would be true regardless where he is?" "It wouldn't matter whether he was in the penitentiary or whether he was free. Wherever he is he's going to continue what he's already been doing." "Would you state whether or not, Doctor, you have an opinion within reasonable psychiatric certainty as to the degree of that probability that you have just expressed to this jury?" "Well, yes, sir, I would put it at one hundred percent and absolute."1
منابع مشابه
Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Furman v. Georgia (1972), held that the death penalty is constitutional only when applied on an individualized basis. The resultant changes in the laws in death penalty states fostered the involvement of psychiatric and psychologic expert witnesses at the sentencing phase of the trial, to testify on two major issues: (1) the mitigating factor of a defendant's abnormal...
متن کاملThe role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials. 200 venirepersons from the 12th Judicial Circuit in Bradenton, FL completed a booklet that contained the following: one question that measured their attitudes toward the death penalty; one question that categorized their death-qualification...
متن کاملMitigation Evaluation: Preparation for a Death Penalty Trial
The purpose of this article is to begin to sociologically define a legal standard for the courts of mitigating factors that should influence the sentence of death. The article also describes a method of inquiry that makes this definition reasonable. The material presented is intended to serve as a guide for the investigation of mitigating circumstances for the sentencing phase of a death penalt...
متن کاملCommentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases.
Montgomery et al. have documented the extent to which jurors apparently do and do not rely on expert testimony regarding dangerousness and mental illness. This article reviews some of the methodological issues raised by their findings and argues that their results have potential value for appellate defense counsel in appealing death sentences in which trial counsel failed to introduce expert te...
متن کاملPeer review of psychiatric expert testimony. American Psychiatric Association's Council on Psychiatry and Law.
Among the most visible and controversial functions of psychiatrists has been their service as expert witnesses for the courts. Psychiatric testimony is called upon in a vast array of cases. In civil law, these include disputes over the capacities of persons to contract, write a will, or manage their affairs; suits alleging emotional harms as the result of tortious acts; and claims of malpractic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 12 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1984