A Double-edged Sword: Using Public Recognition to Encourage Individual Charitable Giving. – Evidence from a Field Experiment in China

نویسندگان

  • Jun Luo
  • Yefeng Chen
  • Haoran He
  • Guanlin Gao
چکیده

Previous research finds that individuals tend to donate more to charitable and non-profit organizations when their activities are publicly recognized. In this research, we find that public recognition may discourage individual giving in certain cases. We conducted a field experiment to investigate how public recognition influences individual charitable giving. We designed five schemes to recognize our donors and varied the timing when we offered the opportunity of public recognition. Results show that while public recognition encourages donors to give more, it crowds out small donations and thus lowers the participation rate. Compared to those cases where public recognition is not available until after donation, when subjects realize they will be recognized, some of them choose to donate more, but others choose to donate 0 rather than a small amount. Therefore, public recognition is a “double-edged sword” on individual charitable giving when this opportunity is offered before donation. JEL classification: C93; L31; H41; D64

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparing Charitable Fundraising Schemes: Evidence from a Field Experiment and a Structural Model by

We present evidence from a natural field experiment designed to shed light on the efficacy of alternative fundraising schemes. In conjunction with the Bavarian State Opera House, we mailed 25,000 regular opera attendees a letter describing a charitable fundraising project organized by the opera house. Recipients were randomly assigned to six treatments designed to explore behavioral responses t...

متن کامل

Comparing Charitable Fundraising Schemes: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment and a Structural Model

We present evidence from a natural field experiment and structural model designed to shed light on the efficacy of alternative fundraising schemes. In conjunction with the Bavarian State Opera, we mailed 25,000 opera attendees a letter describing a charitable fundraising project organized by the opera house. Recipients were randomly assigned to six treatments designed to explore behavioral resp...

متن کامل

Comparing Charitable Fundraising Schemes: Evidence from a Field Experiment and a Structural Model

We present evidence from a natural field experiment and structural model designed to shed light on the efficacy of alternative fundraising schemes. In conjunction with the Bavarian State Opera, we mailed 25,000 opera attendees a letter describing a charitable fundraising project organized by the opera house. Recipients were randomly assigned to six treatments designed to explore behavioral resp...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015