Racial Winners and Losers in American Party Politics
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Democratic and Republican Parties both make strong claims that their policies benefit racial and ethnic minorities. These claims have, however, received little systematic empirical assessment. This is an important omission, because democracy rests on the ability of the electorate to evaluate the responsiveness of those who govern. We assess Democrats’ and Republicans’ claims by compiling census data on annual changes in income, poverty, and unemployment over the last half century for each of America’s racial and ethnic groups. Judged by the empirical record, it is clear which party truly benefits America’s communities of color. When the nation is governed by Democrats, racial and ethnic minority well-being improves dramatically. By contrast, under Republican administrations, blacks, Latinos, and Asian Americans generally suffer losses.
منابع مشابه
Parochial Politics: Ethnic Preferences and Politician Corruption
Does political competition along ethnic lines worsen politician quality? We show that, in a world with incomplete policy commitment, a greater tendency to vote along ethnic lines reduces politician quality even when it does not affect the availability of good candidates and there are no systematic differences in candidate quality across parties. Specifically, ethnic party competition lowers the...
متن کاملThey Want To Eradicate the Nation: A Cross-Linguistic Study of the Attitudinal Language of Presidential Campaign Speeches in the USA and Iran
Politicians adopt a variety of linguistic strategies in their speeches to connect with their audience. To name one, appraisal, as a system of interpersonal meaning, is concerned with evaluation where resources are used for negotiating social relationships. Despite their significance in shaping texts, there have hardly been any extensive inventories of appraisal tools contrasting electoral speec...
متن کاملTransitional Winners and Losers: Attitudes Toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries
Joshua A. Tucker is Assistant Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University, 322 Bendheim Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 ([email protected]). Alexander C. Pacek is Associate Professor of Political Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 ([email protected]). Adam J. Berinsky is Assistant Professor of Politics, Princeton University, 41 Corwin H...
متن کاملSemantic networks and competition: Election year winners and losers in U.S. televised presidential debates, 1960-2004
Drawing on network theory, this study considers the content of U.S. presidential debates and how candidates’ language differentiates them. Semantic network analyses of all U.S. presidential debates (1960–2004) were conducted. Results reveal that regardless of party affiliation, election winners were more central in their semantic networks than losers. Although the study does not argue causation...
متن کاملFeminism and Abortion in the United States’ Party Politics
Abstract The feminist movement in the United States like other countries has tried to establish equality for women. From the first attempts to gain constitutional right for vote, up to the current radical demands, feminists have struggled to make changes in the U.S. party politics and obtain their rights within the parties. One of the important issues in which women played a key role in party ...
متن کامل