Simultaneous Construction of Refutations and Models for Propositional Formulas
نویسنده
چکیده
Methodology is developed to attempt to construct simultaneously either a refutation or a model for a propositional formula in conjunctive normal form. The method exploits the concept of \autarky", which was introduced by Monien and Speckenmeyer. Informally, an autarky is a \self-suucient" model for some clauses, but which does not aaect the remaining clauses of the formula. Whereas their work was oriented toward nding a model, our method has as its primary goal to nd a refutation in the style of model elimination. It also nds a model if it fails to nd a refutation, essentially by combining autarkies. However, the autarky-related processing is integrated with the refutation search, and can greatly improve the eeciency of that search even when a refutation does exist. Unlike the pruning strategies of most reenements of resolution, autarky-related pruning does not prune any successful refutation; it only prunes attempts that ultimately will be unsuccessful; consequently, it will not force the underlying search to nd an unnecessarily long refutation. A game characterization of refutation search is introduced, which demonstrates some symmetries in the search for a refutation and the search for a model. Limited experience with a prototype implementation is reported, and indicates the possibility of developing high-performance refutation methods that are competitive with recently reported model-searching methods. Considerations for rst-order refutation methods are discussed brieey.
منابع مشابه
Proof Complexity of Relativized Statements
The first-order formulas that do not have finite models give rise to uniform families of propositional unsatisfiable formulas, one for each finite cardinality. Motivated by the question of characterizing the class of such formulas whose propositional translations have short resolution refutations, we study their closure properties. Our starting point is the observation that the class of relativ...
متن کاملOn Sparser Random 3SAT Refutation Algorithms and Feasible Interpolation
We formalize a combinatorial principle, called the 3XOR principle, due to Feige, Kim and Ofek [FKO06], as a family of unsatisfiable propositional formulas for which refutations of small size in any propositional proof system that possesses the feasible interpolation property imply an efficient deterministic refutation algorithm for random 3SAT with n variables and Ω(n) clauses. Such small size ...
متن کاملAverage-Case Separation in Proof Complexity: Short Propositional Refutations for Random 3CNF Formulas
Separating different propositional proof systems—that is, demonstrating that one proof system cannot efficiently simulate another proof system—is one of the main goals of proof complexity. Nevertheless, all known separation results between non-abstract proof systems are for specific families of hard tautologies: for what we know, in the average case all (non-abstract) propositional proof system...
متن کاملThe Riis Complexity Gap for QBF Resolution
We give an analogue of the Riis Complexity Gap Theorem for Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs). Every first-order sentence φ without finite models gives rise to a sequence of QBFs whose minimal refutations in tree-like QResolution are either of polynomial size (if φ has no models) or at least exponential in size (if φ has some infinite model). However, differently from the translations to propos...
متن کاملSparser Random 3SAT Refutation Algorithms and the Interpolation Problem
We formalize a combinatorial principle, called the 3XOR principle, due to Feige, Kim and Ofek [14], as a family of unsatisfiable propositional formulas for which refutations of small size in any propositional proof system that possesses the feasible interpolation property imply an efficient deterministic refutation algorithm for random 3SAT with n variables and Ω(n) clauses. Such small size ref...
متن کامل