Can cardiovascular disease guidelines that advise treatment decisions based on absolute risk be improved?
نویسنده
چکیده
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) will remain the predominant cause of death and a major cause of morbidity for the foreseeable future. Consequently, CVD prevention offers the greatest potential for the prevention of premature mortality and the compression of morbidity. DISCUSSION The 2013 guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association expand the eligibility for CVD preventive treatment based on the calculated 10-year CVD risk derived from the pooled cohort equation to all persons who have a 10-year risk of CVD of ≥7.5% as estimated by the pooled cohort equation. Previous analyses show that the use of a uniform 10-year risk threshold of 7.5% for all ages disadvantages younger individuals for whom preventive therapy has most to offer. Here I show that reducing the threshold to 3% in younger adults (women aged <66 years and men aged <56 years) will substantially increase the number of cardiovascular events prevented at a similar number needed to treat to prevent one event. Importantly, this increase in cardiovascular event prevention will occur in individuals with greater life expectancy. CONCLUSION Reducing the threshold 10-year risk of CVD derived from the pooled cohort equation for CVD preventive treatment to 3% in younger adults (women aged <66 years and men aged <56 years) will more effectively prevent premature mortality and compress morbidity to an older age.
منابع مشابه
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension guidelines in South Africa: absolute risk versus blood pressure level.
BACKGROUND Hypertension is responsible for more deaths worldwide than any other cardiovascular risk factor. Guidelines based on blood pressure level for initiation of treatment of hypertension may be too costly compared with an approach based on absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, especially in developing countries. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a Markov CVD model, we compared 6 strategie...
متن کاملThe rationale for differing national recommendations for the treatment of hypertension.
This article examines the rationale for the differences in the guidelines for hypertension management of four national or international bodies: the Joint National Committee (JNC-V), The World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH), the British Hypertension Society (BHS), and the New Zealand guidelines. These guidelines agree on many aspects of management, but differ...
متن کاملCardiovascular and coronary risk estimation in hypertension management.
For many years decisions to treat or not treat hypertension with drugs were made considering the level of blood pressure alone. There was vigorous debate over whether patients should be treated at diastolic pressures of 110, 100, 90 mm Hg or some other threshold. However, epidemiological studies show that the risk of cardiovascular complications such as stroke or myocardial infarction is not de...
متن کاملImproving the cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in Australia: a modelling study
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Like many countries, Australia is currently changing its guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention from drug treatment for everyone with 'high blood pressure' or 'high cholesterol', to prevention based on a patient's absolute risk. In this research, we model cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention ...
متن کاملUsing CART to identify prescribing thresholds for cardiovascular disease
Background and objective Many guidelines for clinical decisions are hierarchical and non-linear. Evaluating if these guidelines are used in practice requires methods that can identify such structures and thresholds. We use classification and regression trees (CART) to analyse prescribing patterns of Australian General Practitioners (GPs) for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Our...
متن کامل