Territorial Disputes at the International Court of Justice
نویسنده
چکیده
In international law and relations, ownership of territory is significant because sovereignty over land defines what constitutes a state. Additionally, as Machiavelli suggested, territorial acquisition is one of the goals of most states. The benefits of having territory, though, are only as great as a state’s borders are clear, because a state’s boundaries must be well defined for the modern state to function. In many cases, however, these boundaries are subject to competing international territorial claims. Such claims can be generally divided into nine categories: treaties, geography, economy, culture, effective control, history, uti possidetis, elitism, and ideology. States have relied on all nine categories to justify legal claims to territory before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The most
منابع مشابه
Islamic Law States and the Authority of the International Court of Justice: TerritorialSovereignty and Diplomatic Immunity
The principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN)—the International Court of Justice (ICJ)—adjudicates interstate disputes and issues advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by authorized UN organs and specialized agencies. The Court has contributed to the peaceful resolution of disputes by delivering justice in a variety of issue areas including territorial sovereignty, marit...
متن کاملPeaceful methods of The International Disputes Settlement and their impact on the development of international trade; With Emphasizing on the scope of the energy industry
International trade litigation represents, the extent to which countries participate in international trade, as well as its business activities on various economic issues. Since energy is one of main pillars of international trade, settlement international disputes can play an important role in international trade.This is especially evident in the energy sector, which plays an important role in...
متن کاملAdministrative Litigations in Iran and France
Administrative litigation is one of the most important issues of administrative law. The purpose of distinguishing between different types of administrative litigations is to explain the judicial procedures relating to each other. According to one of the most important classifications, proposed by Edouard Laferrière in the late nineteenth century and despite criticisms has retained its importan...
متن کاملState Succession in respect of “Right to Reparation” in Jurisprudence of International Court of Justice
Transferring right to reparation, as one of the consequences of succession of states, has always been debatable. International court of justice, meanwhile, has issued decisions which has consisted of the said issue in its proceedings, that is necessiating to revisiting them. The article in hands, explains the views of international court of justice (ICJ) on how the judicial organ of the united ...
متن کامل"COVID-19" and International Law: Prosecution of China in International Court of Justice
"COVID-19", which was first seen in China in December 2019, outbreak worldwide in a short time and took the lives of many people around the world. In addition to claims concerning Chinachr('39')s fault in creating the disease and failing to prevent its spread, it is seriously claimed that China has delayed and sometimes incorrectly reported information concerning disease to the World Health Org...
متن کامل