County Health Rankings and the Cult of the Imperfect.
نویسنده
چکیده
Sir Robert Watson-Watt, who developed early warning radar in Britain during WorldWar II to counter the rapid growth of the Luftwaffe, proposed a “cult of the imperfect,” which he stated as “Give them the third best to go on with; the second best comes too late, the best never comes” (Brown 1999). Just as imperfect radar detected incoming German aircraft to protect British citizens, imperfect public health surveillance systems are widely used to measure and monitor the health of populations to mobilize action toward community health. Defined as the ongoing systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of health data for use in planning, implementing, and evaluating public health practice, public health surveillance serves as the centerpiece of all community health improvement efforts (Remington and Flood 2014). In practice, public health surveillance is a continuous process involving four diverse components: (1) data collection, (2) analysis, (3) interpretation, and (4) dissemination. Each of these steps in the process requires different skills and systems. Information technology and systems engineering are needed to design data collection systems. Epidemiologic and biostatistical methods are needed for data analysis, especially for small areas where data may be sparse or missing. But public health surveillance also requires skills in communications and program planning, to assure that the data are translated into useful information that supports community health improvement efforts (Remington and Nelson 2010). The long-standing tradition of public health surveillance has been simply to “disseminate” results to those working in the public health system. Increasingly, public health surveillance systems have focused on developing specific communication plans to define the purpose of communicating information, understand audiences, developmessages, select appropriate channels, ©Health Research and Educational Trust DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12351 EDITORIAL
منابع مشابه
The County Health Rankings: rationale and methods
BACKGROUND Annually since 2010, the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation have produced the County Health Rankings-a "population health checkup" for the nation's over 3,000 counties. The purpose of this paper is to review the background and rationale for the Rankings, explain in detail the methods we use to create the health rankings in each ...
متن کاملA cross-sectional study on health differences between rural and non-rural U.S. counties using the County Health Rankings
BACKGROUND By examining 2013 County Health Rankings and Roadmaps data from the University of Wisconsin and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, this paper seeks to add to the available literature on health variances between United States residents living in rural and non-rural areas. We believe this is the first study to use the Rankings data to measure rural and urban health differences across ...
متن کاملGovernment Spending In Health And Nonhealth Sectors Associated With Improvement In County Health Rankings.
There is little evidence to demonstrate the impact on local health outcomes of spending that occurs outside the health care sector. We leveraged novel data from the US Census Bureau to measure the independent impact of a community's health and nonhealth expenditures on a broad measure of overall health-the County Health Rankings-over time. Using lagged longitudinal models that accounted for cor...
متن کاملUsing Empirical Bayes Methods to Rank Counties on Population Health Measures
University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute has published County Health Rankings (The Rankings) since 2010. These rankings use population-based data to highlight variation in health and encourage health assessment for all US counties. However, the uncertainty of estimates remains a limitation. We sought to quantify the precision of The Rankings for selected measures. We developed hierar...
متن کاملRelationships between County Health Rankings and child overweight and obesity prevalence: a serial cross-sectional analysis
BACKGROUND The County Health Rankings (CHR) system provides health rankings for U.S. counties. These factors may have utility for evaluating and predicting health outcomes. This study examined the association between CHR factors and the prevalence of child overweight/obesity (OWOB) in the state of Pennsylvania over 3 years. METHODS The prevalence of childhood OWOB was obtained for all Pennsyl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Health services research
دوره 50 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015